Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> ships
> or castles are common in Europe, its the theme, and it would be good to
> separate that
> from the functional category.
I guess that is a good way to look at it.
> BTW, 'mountain' is a bit misleading in the e
John Willis wrote on 2015-07-22 03:47:
On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
I would prefer to have that in the playground:theme=* tag,
thus playground=structure and
playground:theme=octopus_mountain|ship|castle|dungeon|etc
If they were a one-off, yea, but they are a named playgrou
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:52 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> I would prefer to have that in the playground:theme=* tag,
> thus playground=structure and
> playground:theme=octopus_mountain|ship|castle|dungeon|etc
If they were a one-off, yea, but they are a named playground item here (like
climbing hi
Im referring to the base platforms that make up the "uninteresting" part of a
large playground piece. The other things are usually attached to it. Maybe it
has a ladder or steps on one side, but it is the mundane part - the structure.
The slide, rope bridge, zip line, etc are all bolted on the s
sent from a phone
> Am 21.07.2015 um 03:17 schrieb John Willis :
>
> It is probably not practical to tag the stairs, ladders, platforms, holes,
> and other access points that make up the center core of large playground
> structures,
why not? It is the way to go for me, if I am to add more d
John Willis wrote on 2015-07-21 02:14:
On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I think this is ok, if these are indeed japan specific, but I'd add a namespace
like this:
playground=jp:tako_no_yama
so if I was tagging it in english it would be playground=octopus_mountain
Or i
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 3:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> This is almost not more information than without it
I think that is untrue.
If this were building=yes, then it really doesn't give a clue what the
structure is.
But in the playground key, every element is a separate playgrou
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 4:01 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> I think this is ok, if these are indeed japan specific, but I'd add a
> namespace like this:
>
> playground=jp:tako_no_yama
so if I was tagging it in english it would be playground=octopus_mountain
Or in Japanese plaground=jp:た
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote on 2015-07-20 20:56:
Am 20.07.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Marc Gemis :
I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems
the best value for me.
this is almost not more information than without it, all playgrounds will have
some kind of playing st
sent from a phone
> Am 20.07.2015 um 12:09 schrieb Tom Pfeifer :
>
> Andy Mabbett wrote on 2015-07-20 00:44:> On 19 July 2015 at 15:37,
> > I would just tag as "playground=climbingframe" with "material=wood".
>
> I tend to disagree here since climbingframe is one of the specific elements.
> Ma
sent from a phone
> Am 20.07.2015 um 00:46 schrieb John Willis :
>
> Playground=tako_no_yama
I think this is ok, if these are indeed japan specific, but I'd add a namespace
like this:
playground=jp:tako_no_yama
cheers
Martin
___
Tagging mailin
sent from a phone
> Am 20.07.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Marc Gemis :
>
> I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems
> the best value for me.
this is almost not more information than without it, all playgrounds will have
some kind of playing structure- unless it
Any of the pictures from my original mail can be used. They are mine and I
can upload them to commons wikimedia.
regards
m
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Tom Pfeifer
wrote:
> Marc Gemis wrote on 2015-07-20 12:14:
>
>> I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure
>
Marc Gemis wrote on 2015-07-20 12:14:
I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure seems
the best value for me.
...
Is it OK to add this with a picture to the wikipage ?
Fine for me. You might add that rather high in the example list, I'd say.
Do you have a CC-com
I was waiting for some more reactions, but for now playground=structure
seems the best value for me.
And I leave the more detailed mapping of the individual parts to someone
else for now, someone with better pictures, aerial images or GPS waypoints.
I'll add the material=wood
Is it OK to add this
John Willis wrote on 2015-07-20 00:35:
Because it is under the playground tag, just "structure" should be fine.
Structure might be a good value for a large piece, if the other pieces
> (bridges, slides, climbing nets, etc) are large enough to be mappable
> (like a very large installation at a p
A lot of playground equipment has a theme, especially old ones. Concrete
octopuses that you climb and and one of his tentacles is a slide is common (in
old playgrounds) here in Japan. They are so common, they should have a value
(and maybe an icon 🐙 Playground=tako_no_yama)
I think it would do
On 19 July 2015 at 15:37, Marc Gemis wrote:
> I have a problem to properly tag tag wooden constructions that typically
> consists of platforms, towers, bridges, ropes, etc.
I would just tag as "playground=climbingframe" with "material=wood".
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.
Because it is under the playground tag, just "structure" should be fine.
Structure might be a good value for a large piece, if the other pieces
(bridges, slides, climbing nets, etc) are large enough to be mappable (like a
very large installation at a park).
If it is really small with a small s
sent from a phone
> Am 19.07.2015 um 22:36 schrieb Tom Pfeifer :
>
> Probably something with .*combination.* or multi.* ?
> Or, checking some manufacturer's websites, I found
> "play system"
> "playstructure"
> "play combination" "
> "play castle/village"
> "play installation"
>
> Playstructur
I assume you are using the playground=* key already, just looking for a
proper value for these kind of devices?
Probably something with .*combination.* or multi.* ?
Or, checking some manufacturer's websites, I found
"play system"
"playstructure"
"play combination" "
"play castle/village"
"play in
I recently started tagging the playground equipment in the parks in the
neighborhood.
I have a problem to properly tag tag wooden constructions that typically
consists of platforms, towers, bridges, ropes, etc.
e.g.
http://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2015/2015-07-19-Rivierenhof/i-JCHh86F/A
http://x
22 matches
Mail list logo
