Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

2018-01-22 Thread Fernando Trebien
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:14 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2018-01-22 17:25 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien : >> - sett: hewn stones with flat top, wide filled gaps, comfortable to >> cycle and walk on, uncomfortable on high heels [today's image

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

2018-01-22 Thread Fernando Trebien
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 22.01.2018 17:25, Fernando Trebien wrote: >> - sett: hewn stones with flat top (...) [2] (...)> - cobblestone: hewn >> stones with slightly arched top (...) images [3] > and [4] > > I don't believe requiring mappers

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

2018-01-22 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2018-01-22 17:25 GMT+01:00 Fernando Trebien : > - paving_stones: blocks or stones with smooth flat top, tight gaps > [same images as today] > ok > - sett: hewn stones with flat top, wide filled gaps, comfortable to > cycle and walk on, uncomfortable on high heels

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

2018-01-22 Thread Tobias Knerr
On 22.01.2018 17:25, Fernando Trebien wrote: > - sett: hewn stones with flat top (...) [2] (...)> - cobblestone: hewn stones > with slightly arched top (...) images [3] and [4] I don't believe requiring mappers to make a distinction between these two is a good idea. Let's look at your images: >

Re: [Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

2018-01-22 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Seems to be a good idea for me. Requires rushing of real cobblestones, but solves problem of mixing setts colloquially named cobblestone and real cobblestone. So we stop pretending that current tags are correctly used and increase changes that we can distinguish cobblestone and uneven sett. On

[Tagging] Proposed definition for surface=cobblestone/sett/paving_stones

2018-01-22 Thread Fernando Trebien
Hello, Following from this analysis [1], I would like to propose that we abandon cobblestone:flattened, define the new value cobblestone:raised for a rare case, and redefine existing values as follows: - paving_stones: blocks or stones with smooth flat top, tight gaps [same images as today] -