At 2010-08-26 05:08, Tom Chance wrote:
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André
Riedel
riedel.an...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
The source of energy used (generator:source)
Combined with 'generator:method=fission' you have to add
'uranium_235'.
If change the whole system, please add 'wood', 'wood_pellet',
On 21 February 2011 11:08, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2010-08-26 05:08, Tom Chance wrote:
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote: ...
The source of energy used (generator:source) Combined with
'generator:method=fission' you have to add
At 2011-02-21 05:30, Tom Chance wrote:
On 21 February 2011 11:08, Alan
Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
wrote:
At 2010-08-26 05:08, Tom Chance
wrote:
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André Riedel
riedel.an...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
The source of energy used (generator:source)
Combined with
On 28 August 2010 04:30, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netalan_mintz%2b...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Is there a plan to convert the existing data?
I thought about that, but I'm not sure how to proceed. Any advice is
welcome!
I could, of course, just download all data tagged with the old
At 2010-08-28 01:49, Tom Chance wrote:
On 28 August 2010 04:30, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Is there a plan to convert the existing data?
I thought about that, but I'm not sure how to proceed. Any advice is
welcome!
I could, of course, just download all data tagged with the
I would not propose both generator:output=* and generator:output:*=yes. I
think it should be one or the other (probably the latter until we
rationally deal with, or drop, semi-colons).
Is there a plan to convert the existing data?
--
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
Hello,
Following all of the useful feedback on this list and the wiki, I have
rolled together my proposals into one page. This proposes a new set of tags
under generator:*= to specify the kind of power generator.
It rolls together several proposed new tags, and changes to existing tags.
The aim
2010/8/26 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation
The aim is to provide a flexible framework to encompass:
This should allow us to distinguish between a solar photovoltaic panel
producing electricity and a solar thermal
Thank you for these comments, André, I have updated the wiki page with some
amendments:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation
On 26 August 2010 13:43, André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com wrote:
The word 'generator:' is better than 'power:', but it is
2010/8/26 Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net:
The word 'generator:' is better than 'power:', but it is still not
easy for me to tag a heating (only) station with power=generator.
Which rating should be tagged if it is a cogenerating plant?
Electricity only? Heat and Electricity?
That's a good
10 matches
Mail list logo
