Hi
On 2019-03-06 01:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 5. Mar 2019, at 23:06, Richard wrote:
>>
>> highway=via_ferrata is supported by almost all renderers(*) and you will
>> break them.
>> Not only is there no need to remove it but it is highly counterproductive.
>>
Am Mi., 6. März 2019 um 19:21 Uhr schrieb Markus :
> via ferratas also
> don't correspond to the definition of highway=path, which is "a
> generic multi-use path open to non-motorised vehicles".
I would say they would correspond to this definition, unless there is the
via ferrata category
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 23:08, Richard wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:09:31PM +0100, egil wrote:
> > The 3 main goals of this proposal are:
> >
> > 1. the removal of the special tag highway=via_ferrata,
>
> highway=via_ferrata is supported by almost all renderers(*) and you will
> break
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 11:10 AM Adam Franco wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:04 PM Kevin Kenny wrote:
>>
>> Slightly off topic: vie ferrate are not a familiar thing in the
>> mountains near me.
>> Does
>>
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 8:04 PM Kevin Kenny wrote:
> Slightly off topic: vie ferrate are not a familiar thing in the
> mountains near me.
> Does
> http://aspiringfortysixer.com/Upper_Lower_Wolfjaw,_Armstrong_%26_Gothics_files/P1010309.jpg
> count?
>
I wonder this as well. I don't have any direct
sent from a phone
> On 6. Mar 2019, at 02:02, Kevin Kenny wrote:
>
> Slightly off topic: vie ferrate are not a familiar thing in the
> mountains near me.
> Does
> http://aspiringfortysixer.com/Upper_Lower_Wolfjaw,_Armstrong_%26_Gothics_files/P1010309.jpg
> count?
to me it looks like. A via
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:11 AM egil wrote:
>
> The 3 main goals of this proposal are:
>
> 1. the removal of the special tag highway=via_ferrata,
> 2. encouraging tagging of via ferratas as routes and
> 3. general improvement of the data about via ferratas in OSM via new keys.
Slightly off
sent from a phone
> On 5. Mar 2019, at 23:06, Richard wrote:
>
> highway=via_ferrata is supported by almost all renderers(*) and you will
> break them.
> Not only is there no need to remove it but it is highly counterproductive.
>
> via_ferrata_scale on a highway=path would be considered
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 05:09:31PM +0100, egil wrote:
> The 3 main goals of this proposal are:
>
> 1. the removal of the special tag highway=via_ferrata,
highway=via_ferrata is supported by almost all renderers(*) and you will
break them.
Not only is there no need to remove it but it is highly
> In the case of OSM Carto the smart thing may be to not render paths that
I am against proposals attempting to dictate how things should be rendered,
in specific renderers.
Can I recommend rephrasing it to a more neutral
"data consumers can choose hadle specially (hide, avoid in routing,
The 3 main goals of this proposal are:
1. the removal of the special tag highway=via_ferrata,
2. encouraging tagging of via ferratas as routes and
3. general improvement of the data about via ferratas in OSM via new keys.
I welcome any comments and suggestions for improvements. Voting is
11 matches
Mail list logo
