Gary Gallagher wrote:
I certainly think amenity bench should be altered to it to be tagged
as a way. A couple of times I've come across very long bench
structures built a long walls or doubling as long fence structures.
Gary
On Aug 5, 2012 9:21 AM, Komяpa m...@komzpa.net
For direction of the benches mapped as ways I would use analogous*
rule to cliffs and retaining walls, that is: If you hold the bench
with left hand (from the sitting side) you are looking in the same
direction as the way. In other words backrest on left side of the way,
sitting side on right side
Am 05.08.2012 18:10, schrieb LM_1:
For direction of the benches mapped as ways I would use analogous*
rule to cliffs and retaining walls, that is: If you hold the bench
with left hand (from the sitting side) you are looking in the same
direction as the way. In other words backrest on left side
According to the Wiki-page, the tag amenity=waste_basket should be put
to a node. I found ways tagged with this tag [1] in Bakersfield,
California. Is that wrong ?
I think yes, because a waste basket is normally a small amenity.
Therefore a node is sufficient. If it is bigger, than it should
Werner Poppele poppele@... writes:
According to the Wiki-page, the tag amenity=waste_basket should be put
to a node. I found ways tagged with this tag [1] in Bakersfield,
California. Is that wrong ?
I think yes, because a waste basket is normally a small amenity.
Therefore a node is
Hi,
On 04.08.2012 18:10, Werner Poppele wrote:
According to the Wiki-page, the tag amenity=waste_basket should be put
to a node. I found ways tagged with this tag [1] in Bakersfield,
California. Is that wrong ?
Some things are clearly wrong; some things are clearly correct. Between
them
PS: Same with amenity=bench [2]
I found linear amenity=bench quite useful for micromappning and 2.5D rendering:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Kothic-metrics6.png
--
Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski
OSM BY Team - http://openstreetmap.by/
xmpp:m...@komzpa.net mailto:m...@komzpa.net
