Werner Poppele <poppele@...> writes: > > According to the Wiki-page, the tag amenity=waste_basket should be put > to a node. I found ways tagged with this tag [1] in Bakersfield, > California. Is that wrong ? > > I think yes, because a waste basket is normally a small amenity. > Therefore a node is sufficient. If it is bigger, than it should be > tagged as amenity=recycling. Any comments ? > > I would replace them by a single node and add the tags of the way to it. > > WernerP > > PS: Same with amenity=bench [2] > > [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.322431&lon=-119.105307&zoom=20 > [2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.30326&lon=-119.080687&zoom=20 >
That area is extremly thoroughly micromapped and things normally a node could be represented by an area. There could be large container-like waste disposal structures, with only small holes to throw things, they are so big to manage the great amounts of waste produced at a park on a picnic-day. If they have the possibility to through different materials in different holes, it could be a "recycling". If htey are large open containers where one can dump entire sacks of waste, they could eb "waste_disposal". Long park-benches have I myself tagged with a way, seems appropriate. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
