If you look at my entire message, I did point out that vertical clearance was
an attribute of the ways, not the bridge. How should the vertical clearance
from the bridge to the water be tagged, and how do you tag what height of water
was the reference point? If the water level is high, there
Hi
2013/6/5 Martin Koppenhöfer dieterdre...@gmail.com
This one, right?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
+1 from me, although we don't need voting to use the tags ;-)
Sure this one.
I don't recognize the common proposal template.
Is there other
Am 05.06.2013 22:35, schrieb François Lacombe:
Martin, John,
Can't we get the type=tunnel or type=bridge proposal voted and accepted ?
It need a little clean up and example of different kind but it seems to
be a good way to map tunnel and bridges.
Finally asking for comments and vote it
There are three height types for a bridge over a navigable waterway: the
maximum distance from ground level to the highest part of the bridge structure,
the maximum height of vehicle plus cargo that can go across the bridge, and the
maximum clearance for vehicles passing under the bridge. The
Hi,
I agree with you Martin.
And that's why I'm looking for a way to say those power
lines/lanes/roads are on the same bridge/tunnel.
As you mentionned, the tunnel/bridge name can precise which bridge is
but it's not a relational (or even spatial) way of bringing objets
together.
Ok a tunnel
Am 05.06.2013 um 10:37 schrieb François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu:
As you mentionned, the tunnel/bridge name can precise which bridge is
but it's not a relational (or even spatial) way of bringing objets
together.
Ok a tunnel isn't easy to map since we can't use GPS.
2013/6/5 Martin Koppenhöfer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
yes, but you can easily see whether it is one tube with both directions
going through, or if there is one tube per direction (more usual case due
to security reasons). Then you still have to define what is one tunnel,
maybe also 2 (or more)
On 05/giu/2013, at 11:30, François Lacombe
francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu wrote:
We don't need to create dedicated geometry for an highway tunnel since the
geometry of the road gives the path followed by this tunnel.
for Road tunnels this is mostly true, but if you look at caves
One reason it would be useful to be able to tag bridges (and, to a lesser
extent, tunnels) as single physical objects is that they may be used as
landmarks. For example, you may be traveling along a street that runs parallel
to a river, looking for a location just past a certain bridge. If
Am 05.06.2013 00:11, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
On 04/giu/2013, at 08:54, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
A motorway with two separate highways in OSM may be one bridge
alltogether - but is mapped as two.
actually we usually don't map bridges or tunnels, there is only
Martin, John,
Can't we get the type=tunnel or type=bridge proposal voted and accepted ?
It need a little clean up and example of different kind but it seems to be
a good way to map tunnel and bridges.
Finally asking for comments and vote it is the best way to be sure of it.
Fly,
Tunnel and
Thanks fly for this answer.
Type=tunnel can suits my needs : let's add all power lines in the
relation with role=through.
Add tubes or not depends on the tunnel design, not on what's inside. I
don't mind.
The trick is to link many power lines to a single tunnel.
However, it would be hard to
Hi
That's already a problem for ways, too:
A motorway with two separate highways in OSM may be one bridge
alltogether - but is mapped as two.
A street where the footways along are separated by a small wall or a
hedge is drawn as distinct osm ways (at least it should be) but if these
ways share the
Am 04.06.2013 11:15, schrieb François Lacombe:
2013/6/4 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
On 04.06.2013 00:26, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently improving draft of power transmission refinement proposal
and a question about underground features can't currently find answer.
On 04/giu/2013, at 08:54, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
A motorway with two separate highways in OSM may be one bridge
alltogether - but is mapped as two.
actually we usually don't map bridges or tunnels, there is only the indirect
mapping with an attribute on the road
Hi,
I'm currently improving draft of power transmission refinement proposal and
a question about underground features can't currently find answer.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement
I wonder how we can map power lines underground and infrastructure
On 04.06.2013 00:26, François Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently improving draft of power transmission refinement proposal
and a question about underground features can't currently find answer.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement
I wonder how
17 matches
Mail list logo
