Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

Out of curiosity, I looked the Web for wiggly pavement for drainage. Somme pavement have extra tips on the side for increased spacing. Apparently, as long as it's built on sand, the drainage is pretty good, no mention of a loose setup. Maybe the politician is very good at his job? ;-) Yves Le

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

Hi, yes, I think paving_stones is right, but I'm fairly convinced that it was built wiggly on purpose, otherwise the politician wouldn't have had a special word for it. I couldn't find anything on wikipedia about the topic, unfortunately. Cycling across is not a problem, if you don't mind the

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I also would go with surface=paving_stones - and maybe add also smoothness tag, and agree with Fernando Feb 21, 2024, 01:47 by fernando.treb...@gmail.com: > I think they are surface=paving_stones because: > - the stones are very flat on top > - it seems that the objective was to arrange them

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I think they are surface=paving_stones because: - the stones are very flat on top - it seems that the objective was to arrange them snugly, although the fit may have deteriorated a little - it seems pretty easy to ride a bike there, but not skate, which is what one generally expects from

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

On 18/2/24 05:52, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: Judging from those photographs, they would be material=sett, but the surface is not the same, as I said, the stones have some room to wiggle, there is no filler in between the stones. On 17/02/2024 18:41, Yves via Tagging wrote:

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

Sett around here looks very similar. It wiggles when I am on a bike, and it's set in sand. On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 00:35, Yves via Tagging wrote: > Interesting, this could also be used to let water in the ground in order > not to cause subsidence by drying out the underground. Maybe we shouldn't

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

Interesting, this could also be used to let water in the ground in order not to cause subsidence by drying out the underground. Maybe we shouldn't map the intent, but be more descriptive. Technically, it is possibly just sett, but loose? Yves Le 17 février 2024 22:59:08 GMT+01:00,

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I asked a local Green politician, and it's apparently called "subsidence paving",  invented in earthquake zones in northern Italy. On 17/02/2024 17:46, Åbn wrote: I think you should provide a picture. On February 17, 2024 5:19:06 PM UTC, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: I'm not

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

Judging from those photographs, they would be material=sett, but the surface is not the same, as I said, the stones have some room to wiggle, there is no filler in between the stones. On 17/02/2024 18:41, Yves via Tagging wrote: Surface=Paved is generic. Maybe you're talking about cobblestone?

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

That's the best I can do for now: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.65192667=-7.251596667=17=1685817985195902=photo=0.22772882642716127=0.968169011381621=0 You can kind of see the gaps between the stones. On 17/02/2024 17:46, Åbn wrote: I think you should provide a picture. On

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

Surface=Paved is generic. Maybe you're talking about cobblestone? Le 17 février 2024 18:19:06 GMT+01:00, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging a écrit : >I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I think you should provide a picture. On February 17, 2024 5:19:06 PM UTC, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: >I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences between surface=sett and >surface=paved or if what I'm trying to map is covered by either. Where I >live, there are some streets

Re: [Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I think you should provide a picture On February 17, 2024 5:19:06 PM UTC, Anne-Karoline Distel via Tagging wrote: >I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences between surface=sett and >surface=paved or if what I'm trying to map is covered by either. Where I >live, there are some streets that

[Tagging] tagging "loose" paving stones

I'm not sure I'm understanding the differences between surface=sett and surface=paved or if what I'm trying to map is covered by either. Where I live, there are some streets that are paved, but the stones aren't set firmly, so they wobble a bit when you drive/ cycle over them. It is perfectly