Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Hello, Am 2017-11-14 20:31, schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: >> Perhaps it should be altered after the voting? Don't change the content of the proposal page once the vote has started. Fix the "typo" on the pages of the keys. Regards, Marc ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

On 2017-11-14 19:34, David Marchal wrote: > Hi, Yuri. > > Though I understand your request and find it relevant, I’m unsure > about altering a proposal page after the vote had started; AFAIK, I’m > supposed to let it as is, apart from the vote section. Could you show > me if my assumption is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Am 2017-11-14 20:31, schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: Hi David, you do have a point. Perhaps it should be altered after the voting? Unless if no one has voted yet one way or the other? Awaiting other opinions. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:34 PM, David Marchal wrote: Hi, Yuri.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Hi David, you do have a point. Perhaps it should be altered after the voting? Unless if no one has voted yet one way or the other? Awaiting other opinions. On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 1:34 PM, David Marchal wrote: > Hi, Yuri. > > Though I understand your request and find it

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Hi, Yuri. Though I understand your request and find it relevant, I’m unsure about altering a proposal page after the vote had started; AFAIK, I’m supposed to let it as is, apart from the vote section. Could you show me if my assumption is wrong, or can someone on the ML confirm or infirm that?

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

David, hi, just an thought - could you combine the rationale and examples sections? The way you have it now is first you describe each concept, and afterwards you have the same concept but with a picture. I think it would be better to list each variant with the picture right away. Thanks! On

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Hello, there. Almost 3 weeks passed and only 3 people told that they preferred karst=yes instead of karstic=yes. As the first one was also the one stated as the proposal, and the second one was only mentioned in erroneous examples, I assume this relative unanimity is enough to confirm

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Sinkholes refinement

Hello, there. The vote period passed, and the proposal received a total of 16 approvals, 1 spoilt vote and 0 refusals, so I closed the vote and marked the proposal as approved. Thanks to all the voters; I’ll create the according Wiki pages and edit existing ones to reflect the vote on the