Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-26 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 23.03.2015 21:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-03-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de mailto:o...@stephans-server.de: The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used when exact details of the operator are not known, other than that they

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-26 Thread John F. Eldredge
If the business sells small quantities of fuel (automotive or otherwise), but not car parts, then in what sense does shop=car_parts apply? Fuel is not part of the car. On March 23, 2015 8:55:57 AM CDT, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote: On 23.03.2015 11:02, Dave Swarthout wrote: An

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread John Willis
If it is a place to buy 50l of petrol with a credit card, and 200 people can use it a day, it's a Normal gas station. If you hand the card to a clerk or pay at the pump (almost every single gas station in America, and more and more in Japan) - it's still a gas station. I don't think people

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-24 11:28 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com: There's no need to remove it since it's clearly understood by most people to mean tools, custom items, maybe even tickets to an auto show. IMHO the only valid word there is car parts, because if they don't have car parts but

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Dave Swarthout
There's no need to remove it since it's clearly understood by most people to mean tools, custom items, maybe even tickets to an auto show. Motor oil is sold at a car_parts shop because it is non-volatile and therefore poses no fire or explosion risk. This is emphatically not the case with

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 18:48 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at: Petrol is similar to motor oil, both are fluids made from mineral oil. Diesel is identical with light fuel oil. So this is clearly the same group of products, especially when sold in equally small quantities. What else is the etc.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-24 Thread Dave Swarthout
It's interesting that you brought that up because most fuel stations in the United States actually use vending machines as well. AFAIK, the only state in the United States that still requires an attendant to pump your gas is Oregon. In a way, even though the fuel shops I'm dealing with in Thailand

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Jan van Bekkum
+5 I fully agree with Dave! We need a clear differentiation between regular filling stations with large underground containers and the shops that sell a few liters of diesel of which you may hope that it isn't polluted and doesn't contain water. When I travel in countries like Malawi or Ethiopia

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 22.03.2015 20:29, fly wrote: some independent petrol stations are organized in associations and use these as their brand, see e.g. here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverband_freier_Tankstellen So it is a brand. Maybe just small, but a brand of that association of fuel stations. not

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 23.03.2015 15:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at mailto:b...@volki.at: Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but rather a shop=car_parts. 2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
Sorry, fuel is not a car_part. And these small fuel shops are not an amenity. Stalemate. @Fly - these places are operated by private individuals out of the front of their homes primarily. It's typically a small shed with a large window thru which the fuel is either pumped or handed over in

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de: The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used when exact details of the operator are not known, other than that they are a small independent firm. Sounds like that's exactly what we are looking for.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
I don't object to the operator=independent tag. That's an okay addition to the scenario. However, I do object to tagging these things as amenities. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, fuel is not a car_part. And these small fuel shops are not an

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 15:30 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at: 2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts. The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories, motor oil, car chemicals, etc. That fits perfectly. can you expand? Someone sitting

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread fly
Am 23.03.2015 um 07:02 schrieb johnw: On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the existing values and it should be fine. I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene. The wiki entry

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 23.03.2015 11:02, Dave Swarthout wrote: An amenity is something the /general public/ might like or use or want to visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They sell small quantities of fuel, usually 2 or 3 liters, to local motorcycle drivers. That's why the general public might

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at: Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but rather a shop=car_parts. 2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts. cheers, Martin ___

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 14:55 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at: Ok, if it's only 2 or 3 liters, it's not really a fuel station, but rather a shop=car_parts. I'd prefer shop=pharmacy, dispensing=no ;-) Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 23.03.2015 14:50, Friedrich Volkmann wrote: amenity=fuel fuel=bottled Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel station. That's fine, because selling fuel is what makes it a fuel station. You have missed the point of this thread. The world is not perfect.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread fly
Am 23.03.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: 2015-03-23 15:27 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de: The wiki describes operator=independent as he value has been used when exact details of the operator are not known, other than that they are a small independent firm.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-23 11:02 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com: I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed). This is not the way to go. An amenity is something the *general public* might like or use or want to visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They sell

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread johnw
On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: You can change it .. or make proposals here. Just don't change the existing values and it should be fine. I'd think you'd be adding heating oils, propane and kerosene. The wiki entry is uneditable - I’ve edited quite a few

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Jan van Bekkum
How does the tagging differ from an unstaffed filling station where you enter your credit card and fill up the tank of your car yourself 24/7 like I seem them all over the place in the Netherlands? In the situation you describe I really prefer shop=*. Regards, Jan At these places you

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-03-23 11:02 GMT+01:00 Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com: I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed). This is not the way to go. An amenity is something the general public might like

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 20.03.2015 00:48, Warin wrote: On 20/03/2015 9:39 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: amenity=fuel fuel=bottled Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote: I agree with amenity=fuel + a subtag like these (if needed). This is not the way to go. An amenity is something the *general public* might like or use or want to visit. These little shops are definitely not that. They

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread John Willis
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 24, 2015, at 2:48 AM, Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at wrote: On 23.03.2015 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts. The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories, motor

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Friedrich Volkmann
On 23.03.2015 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2 liters of fuel are as much car_parts as a bakery is bicycle_parts. The definition says: A place selling auto parts, auto accessories, motor oil, car chemicals, etc. That fits perfectly. can you expand? Someone sitting

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
I agree completely with what John said in the previous reply. Repeat: a fuel shop is not a car_parts shop. The etc. was probably added there as a catch all to include tools specific to cars or whatever but it definitely, certainly does not include petrol. Dave On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:37 AM,

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread Dave Swarthout
Also, Bryce makes this point, a valid point I must add: These stands are also far more volatile than a proper fuel station. And once they cease business very hard to un-map. That's true but it's also true of many other objects. Mapping the world is a dynamic endeavor because things change:

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread John Willis
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: n the 5 years I've been motorcycling around Thailand I'm seeing more and more of these. But the other type, the shops we're working with now, will likely be around for many years. They should

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-23 Thread johnw
On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: The etc. was probably added there as a catch all to include tools specific to cars or whatever but it definitely, certainly does not include petrol. Car stores sell all the aftermarket stuff for cars (besides

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread fly
Am 19.03.2015 um 17:43 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: 2015-03-19 17:12 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com: brand=none or no_brand=yes to proper mark the independence. some independent petrol stations are organized in associations and use these as their brand, see e.g. here:

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Paul Johnson
Argh, let's not invent yet another amenity type for this. Why not tag for the dispenser type? Then you'd still be able to find fuel as an amenity (which is better than nothing if you don't get your preferred dispenser type in most cases) but you could, say, filter for only fuel amenities that

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: I've come across regular filling stations without a roof. Somewhere in Scotland.. on a Sunday .. no one there but a credit card reader so I could get fuel. Others in Australia .. White Cliffs, Warburton, Docker River,

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread johnw
On Mar 23, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: Nobody's proposing another amenity tag. My thrust here is to gather opinions about adding another shop key, this one a shop for petrol (gas, gasohol, etc.). The places I have in mind are not the same as

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Dave Swarthout
Nobody's proposing another amenity tag. My thrust here is to gather opinions about adding another shop key, this one a shop for petrol (gas, gasohol, etc.). The places I have in mind are not the same as standard fueling places, tagged amenity=fuel, in fact, I wish them to be tagged

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-22 Thread Jan van Bekkum
There is also more risk that fuel sold for cars is more polluted or that water was added. Met vriendelijke groet/with kind regards, *Jan van Bekkum* www.DeEinderVoorbij.nl Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: Obviously many mappers aren't reading the Wiki and use whatever tag sounds right to them. Makes what we're discussing here seem like a waste of energy :-( Wrong! Our process here will result in a tag that even

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:20 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote: I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type. I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, wood, different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even farm gas

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 20.03.2015 11:44, John Willis wrote: As long as distribution is non-traditional, a shop selling fuel oil and cordwood for heating is fine with me (I have to read up on fuel= tagging ) shop=fuel sounds reasonable. It seems to be used for coal, heating oil and kerosine. And a hand full of

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Dave Swarthout
I was gonna say we should probably consider adding subtags for bottled gas like propane and butane so that shop=gas might eventually be subsumed by a new overall shop=fuel. By the way, firewood is a fuel and could conceivably fit in here too. I would want to stay away from using another amenity

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread John Willis
I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type. I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, wood, different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even farm gas which has different taxes. How can those be defined - esp if a shop

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Warin
On 20/03/2015 5:08 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com mailto:daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: Obviously many mappers aren't reading the Wiki and use whatever tag sounds right to them. Makes what we're discussing here seem

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-19 22:46 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com: I've come across regular filling stations without a roof. +1, in Italy you can find lots of them (in the city there are much more of these than roofed ones). Also don't seem to have oil traps in many occasions (not completely sure on

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread johnw
On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: On 20/03/2015 6:20 PM, John Willis wrote: I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type. I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, wood, different grades of gas, diesel,

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Warin
On 20/03/2015 6:20 PM, John Willis wrote: I haven't had a chance to read up on how to define the fuel type. I imagine there is various heating oils, propane and kerosene, LNG, coal, wood, different grades of gas, diesel, aviation fuel, jet fuel, etc - even farm gas which has different taxes.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Warin
On 20/03/2015 5:01 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: I was gonna say we should probably consider adding subtags for bottled gas like propane and butane so that shop=gas might eventually be subsumed by a new overall shop=fuel. By the way, firewood is a fuel and could conceivably fit in here too. I

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread John Willis
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2015, at 9:18 PM, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote: There is a similar confusion for kerosine (US), paraffine (UK), petroleum (NL); it all the same liquid Yikes! Paraffin is a wax, and petroleum is just a fancy word for oil in general. I think

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-20 Thread Jan van Bekkum
There is a similar confusion for kerosine (US), paraffine (UK), petroleum (NL); it all the same liquid. On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:29 PM johnw jo...@mac.com wrote: On Mar 20, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: On 20/03/2015 6:20 PM, John Willis wrote: I haven't had a

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 19 March 2015 at 21:46, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: The existence of a roof does not identify a 'regular filling station' to me. amenity=fuel pumps=8 vs. amenity=fuel pumps=0 ? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: If you do require a larger volume of fuel .. I think those low volume places would direct you to a high volume place, and be able to provide enough fuel to get there. If you speak their language :-). The bottled fuel is

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: amenity=fuel fuel=bottled Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel station. fuel=bottled in addition would create some confusion if the fuel was in a drum with a pump.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Warin
On 20/03/2015 9:30 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: On 19 March 2015 at 21:46, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: The existence of a roof does not identify a 'regular filling station' to me. amenity=fuel pumps=8 vs. amenity=fuel pumps=0 ? Humm pump is used

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Warin
On 20/03/2015 9:01 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: On 19 March 2015 at 09:18, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: Here in Thailand, and especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor fuel in small quantities. amenity=fuel fuel=bottled The key fuel= is used to

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Warin
On 20/03/2015 9:39 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk mailto:a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote: amenity=fuel fuel=bottled Which would render indistinguishable from a full service fuel station. fuel=bottled in addition would

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Dave Swarthout
I don't see where all the confusion comes from. I chose shop=fuel for the exact reason of avoiding confusion with full-service filling stations, which is the primary reason for wanting a new tag in the first place. We want to avoid using amenity=fuel for this type of shop. I have designed a custom

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andrew Errington
I think they should remain as amenity=fuel (I have visited Thailand and I know what you mean). Local people will know what to expect, but for clarity perhaps subtags should be used to add detail and differentiate between a filling station and a lemonade stand selling fuel. On Thursday, 19 March

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
Good idea to have such a tag, should include diesel for cars, kerosine for heating and propane/butane for cooking that are sold in the same way. I Kenya we have been in areas far away from regular filling stations; there people are selling diesel from drums. I think shop=fuel is dangerous as it

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Lukas Sommer
In Benin (Africa) these shops exist also – mostly only a table with some big bottles with fuel. 2015-03-19 9:18 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com: I want to float an idea to get your reactions. Here in Thailand, and especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to be rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas with subtag would be better. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:46 AM Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com wrote: I think they should remain as

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread johnw
I have a similar issue in Japan. Japan uses kerosene for portable heaters in the winter, and there is no real fuel delivery (to a consumer), such as heating oil in the Eastern US. Everyone in Japan has use use plastic 5Gal/18-20L tanks carried in the car and kept outside the house for filling

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread David Bannon
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 08:46 +1100, Warin wrote: I've come across regular filling stations without a roof. Indeed, absolutely no reason a full service or pump based fuel supplier must have a roof. Usually an office (or shipping container) nearby but pumps out in the open is very common.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:40 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote: If the DIY kerosene stands were tagged as gas stations, there would be thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of gas stations across Japan that are not gas stations. So I agree we should use shop=fuel. Great input, up to the

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread John Willis
Maybe amenity=fuel_stand? Then we can tag it onto existing shops (like a DIY store) or micromap it onto gas stations. As long as distribution is non-traditional, a shop selling fuel oil and cordwood for heating is fine with me (I have to read up on fuel= tagging ) I know there are shops and

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andreas Goss
You could set all the fuel types to no (fuel:*=no), or add a new one (fuel:motorbike=yes). Or add motorbike=fuel. Except there isn't anything like motorbile fuel. Keeping it as amenity=fuel means all mapping tools and search tools continue to work. Which is exactly the problem. Now your

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
It is expected that most renderers only look at the namespace tag, not at the attributes. How do we ensure that I don't end up at a bottle store while I expect a decent filling station. I am afraid that we pollute the amenity=fuel tag if we use it for fuel out of a drum as well? We really should

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread John F. Eldredge
In American ideom, gas is often a contraction of gasoline, which the British call petrol. Given differing terminology, and that such shops may sell propane and diesel fuel as well as gasoline/petrol, shop=fuel is probably the best solution. On March 19, 2015 8:21:36 AM CDT, Janko Mihelić

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Janko Mihelić
2015-03-19 13:46 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com: I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to be rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas with subtag would be better. I like shop, but gas is an aggregate state of

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Stephan Knauss
On 19.03.2015 20:31, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: However I can see nothing wrong with amenity=fuel, that is what it is in that part of the world . What turns amenity=fuel into a regular filling station is the building=roof. There is a huge difference. You'll notice that if you end up with

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread phil
On Thu Mar 19 12:46:02 2015 GMT, Jan van Bekkum wrote: I would prefer a different tag as I would not like the lemonade table to be rendered in the same way as a regular filling station. The tag shop=gas with subtag would be better. I would expect shop=gas to sell bottled gas for camping Gas

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andrew Errington
But, it *is* a fuel amenity. It's down to the individual what picture they have in their mind. Additional tags would clarify this, but I don't think alternative tags are needed. You could set all the fuel types to no (fuel:*=no), or add a new one (fuel:motorbike=yes). Or add motorbike=fuel.

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-19 17:51 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com: It is expected that most renderers only look at the namespace tag, not at the attributes. How do we ensure that I don't end up at a bottle store while I expect a decent filling station. I am afraid that we pollute the

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
amenity=bottled_motor_fuel phone= (because many have mobile phones) name= (name of individual proprietor) It has the same fuzzy border as supermarket vs. convenience. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Jan van Bekkum
+1 The last thin I want is to count on a regular filling station and to and up at a bottle store with my 4WD. A that will happen if the type of store is an attribute, as map makers will show them the same. So please make it a different value for the tag, not fuel. On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:11 PM

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 19 March 2015 at 09:18, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com wrote: Here in Thailand, and especially in rural areas, there are hundreds of shops that sell motor fuel in small quantities. amenity=fuel fuel=bottled -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread fly
I see no problem with amenity or shop as long as the description on the wiki is well done. It is an amenity no doubt but we need proper subtags for the vehicles and the amount. shop=fuel was mentioned on a different thread about companies which fill up your private diesel or gas tanks for

Re: [Tagging] Fuel shops

2015-03-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-03-19 17:12 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com: brand=none or no_brand=yes to proper mark the independence. some independent petrol stations are organized in associations and use these as their brand, see e.g. here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesverband_freier_Tankstellen not