sent from a phone
> On 29. Jul 2020, at 18:50, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>
> Do we really not have a way to tag *platforms*?
only for public transport, otherwise you could tag them with highway=pedestrian
and area=yes
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 02:50, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
>
> Do we really not have a way to tag *platforms*?
>
We do have man_made=platform https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573403125,
but it doesn't render in any way :-(
On 29/07/2020 10.57, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 09:47, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
So... back to my *other* question: how should a raised wooden platform
on land be tagged? For example:
https://www.pitztal.com/sites/default/files/styles/adaptive/public/thumb_5101_lightbox.jpeg
On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 09:47, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> So... back to my *other* question: how should a raised wooden platform
> on land be tagged? For example:
>
> https://www.pitztal.com/sites/default/files/styles/adaptive/public/thumb_5101_lightbox.jpeg
>
On 28/07/2020 16.09, Paul Allen wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a pier
with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts off the
part that is on land.
There is no part of a pier on land.
Jul 29, 2020, 02:39 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
> & for one that IMHO is quite correctly tagged as a pier over it's full length:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18776776#map=17/-27.93856/153.43009
>
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/10370420-3x2-700x467.jpg
>
+1
See also (open licensed
& for one that IMHO is quite correctly tagged as a pier over it's full
length:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18776776#map=17/-27.93856/153.43009
https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/10370420-3x2-700x467.jpg
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Subject: Re: [Tagging] How to map "piers" on land?
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a pier
with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts off the
part that is on land.
There
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 22:51, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
> Jul 28, 2020, 22:09 by pla16...@gmail.com:
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke
> wrote:
>
> Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a pier
> with a platform
Jul 28, 2020, 22:09 by pla16...@gmail.com:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke <> mwoehlke.fl...@gmail.com> >
> wrote:
>
>> Please see >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930>> . This is a pier
>> with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts off the
>>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 21:57, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>
> This is not in line with current usage in OSM, e.g.
>
In which case the wiki page is unclear and misleading.
--
Paul
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 16:10, Paul Allen wrote:
> There is no part of a pier on land. Not according to the wiki: "A pier is a
> raised
> walkway over water..." and "Lastly, connect the pier with other ways on land,
> otherwise it will result in a "island" that can't be used for routing." The
On Tuesday 28 July 2020, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a
> pier with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts
> off the part that is on land.
>
> Is this a carto bug or should the part that is on land be tagged
>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 at 20:44, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651244930. This is a pier
> with a platform on land that extends into the water. Carto cuts off the
> part that is on land.
>
There is no part of a pier on land. Not according to the wiki: "A
14 matches
Mail list logo
