i have started a proposal for simple automated tasks. i will leave it
in the RFC state until someone, who knows how to create a bot, can
provide a prototype for a small imited bbox, so we can see if this one
is actually doable (performance and security wise).
2011/4/24 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com:
i have started a proposal for simple automated tasks. i will leave it
in the RFC state until someone, who knows how to create a bot, can
provide a prototype for a small imited bbox, so we can see if this one
is actually doable (performance and security wise).
I think the number of tags in this kind of proposal would balloon
quickly, so let me suggest instead that tags of this nature be put on
the changeset, with a then request to bot authors to check object
history and changesets, rather than more tags on the object.
In other words, use the changeset
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/associatedAddress
coincidentally the author of associatedEntrance seems to have stumbled
across the same kind of problem and has written a proposal at the same
day as i did. but after going through his proposal, there is a
difference: while his
On 04/21/2011 08:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but apparently it's not fixable:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3478 What should be done?
I would continue to tag the locations of the
On 4/24/11 4:06 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/24/2011 3:32 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/21/2011 08:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but apparently it's not fixable:
On 4/24/2011 4:12 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 4/24/11 4:06 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/24/2011 3:32 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/21/2011 08:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but
On 4/24/11 4:14 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/24/2011 4:12 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
... put both tags on the single node or polygon. it's still a
rendering issue, whether or not it's easy to fix in mapnik.
I agree, but why was it closed as won't fix? Shouldn't it be kept
open until
On 24. 04. 11 21:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/21/2011 08:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but apparently it's not fixable:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3478 What should be done?
There
On 4/24/11 5:11 PM, yvecai wrote:
On 24. 04. 11 21:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/21/2011 08:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but apparently it's not fixable:
On 4/24/2011 5:11 PM, yvecai wrote:
On 24. 04. 11 21:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/21/2011 08:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but apparently it's not fixable:
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:41:12 -0400
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Fwd: Feature Proposal - RFC - automated tasks
I think the number of tags in this kind of proposal would balloon
quickly, so let me suggest instead that tags of this nature be put on
the
On 24. 04. 11 23:24, Richard Welty wrote:
On 4/24/11 5:11 PM, yvecai wrote:
On 24. 04. 11 21:32, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 04/21/2011 08:15 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Using both railway=station and amenity=bus_station gives two labels in
Mapnik. I reported this as a bug but apparently it's not
I can think of many other situations where the same node would correspond to
more than one thing; having only one name label render, rather than multiple
labels, seems like it would be simple to implement as long as only a single
icon will be rendered. If you are going to render multiple
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
some highways have split max speed values, different
for passenger cars and trucks. i don't see any provision
for tagging this on the map features page.
are there any existing proposals for dealing with this?
if
On 4/24/11 8:12 PM, Nakor Osm wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Richard Weltyrwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
some highways have split max speed values, different
for passenger cars and trucks. i don't see any provision
for tagging this on the map features page.
are there any existing
At 2011-04-24 13:46, Richard Welty wrote:
some highways have split max speed values, different
for passenger cars and trucks. i don't see any provision
for tagging this on the map features page.
are there any existing proposals for dealing with this?
if there aren't, i'd like to suggest
17 matches
Mail list logo
