Am 07.10.2013 19:13, schrieb Richard Welty:
On 10/7/13 1:08 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I remember seeing such a cyclists must dismount on the narrow
footway of a bridge over the James River, in Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Not only was the footway narrow, [...]
there's a cyclists must dismount
Am 08.10.2013 20:16, schrieb Volker Schmidt:
Just for your reference - while for many cases, I agree that
bicycle=no
is appropriate, there are quite interesting cycleways in the Czech
Republic, where using bicycle=dismount for nodes on a path would
make things easier for
On 7 October 2013 17:09, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
I wonder if it is useful to tag bicycle=dismount on ways.
At least in Germany there is no official traffic sign despite of the
existence of some.
I don't think the issue here is really whether there is a need within
instances of
2013/10/9 Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com
f bicycle=* is currently widely used to express access rights for
cycling, then I'd suggest we leave it like that, as it does the job
pretty well.
+1
Rather than trying to add additional values to this key
to capture
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
On the units I've seen in the wild the term aed or AED appears in nearly
every case, but the word defibrillator is frequently absent.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Andrew Errington
Yup, in Japan they are *everywhere*,
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 18:06:52 Pieren wrote:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
On the units I've seen in the wild the term aed or AED appears in
nearly every case, but the word defibrillator is frequently absent.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Andrew
Hi Bryce,
Did you mean you find the proposal a bit difficult to understand ?
Yes it is. Nevertheless, many of tagging is optional, I can edit the
document to show it in a more understandable way.
This proposal doesn't prevent mappers to map large overhead transmission
lines as landmark if they
Hi,
I wonder if there is somebody interested in tagging large areas. I
started tagging some highlands, because there is nothing compareable to
this.
Tagging highlands might be not so much about ground survey, because
there are usually no borders with a label, but they seem to be obviously
2013/10/9 Tobias cra_klinr...@gmx.de
Do you have any suggestions for the tagging?
this is a topic discussed several times in precedence, you can find
discussions here and also on talk-de (your email suggests you understand
German). Basically our data model is not very suited to tag large
Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de wrote:
Am 07.10.2013 19:13, schrieb Richard Welty:
On 10/7/13 1:08 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I remember seeing such a cyclists must dismount on the narrow
footway of a bridge over the James River, in Richmond, Virginia,
USA.
Not only was the footway
Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de wrote:
Am 07.10.2013 19:13, schrieb Richard Welty:
On 10/7/13 1:08 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
I remember seeing such a cyclists must dismount on the
narrow footway of a bridge over the James River, in
2013/10/9 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
I think bicycle=no would be clearer in meaning.
you can insist on this, but we are not starting to map right now, and given
that bicycle has the longstanding meaning of cyclist in osm, your
proposal would imply a change on this meaning --- a tag
2013/10/9 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
this is a topic discussed several times in precedence, you can find
discussions here and also on talk-de (your email suggests you understand
German).
Another starting point could be the following (abandoned) proposal
Can happen where pedestrians and stopping are prohibited, but cycling is
allowed.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 09/10/2013 14:55 John F. Eldredge wrote:
Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de wrote:
Am 07.10.2013 19:13, schrieb Richard Welty:
On 10/7/13 1:08 PM, John F.
2013/10/9 Michael Krämer ohr...@gmail.com
2013/10/9 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
this is a topic discussed several times in precedence, you can find
discussions here and also on talk-de (your email suggests you understand
German).
Another starting point could be the following
this is a topic discussed several times in precedence, you can find
discussions here and also on talk-de (your email suggests you understand
German).
Another starting point could be the following (abandoned) proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Region and its
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Michael Krämer ohr...@gmail.com wrote:
Another starting point could be the following (abandoned) proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Region and its
discussion page.
Bad idea. Replace region by boundary or multipolygon and you get
it.
this is a topic discussed several times in precedence, you can find
discussions here and also on talk-de (your email suggests you understand
German).
I read the last discussion about natural/mapping large areas a
little bit.
Actually my preparation was mainly based on the missing content at
2013/10/9 Tobias cra_klinr...@gmx.de
It might be a better idea to start a parallel project (e.g. with
shapefiles
in a more adequate scale), e.g. starting with natural earths physical
dataset and adding translations and refinements. This dataset could be
crowdsourced and distributed in a
2013/10/9 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
After I posted this message, I read another message suggesting
bicycle:push=no, which is a better suggestion than bicycle=no.
I still believe that something along foot:bicycle-pushing=no would be
better, as a cyclist who dismounted his bicycle
btw.: here you can find maps with the natural regions (apparently complete)
of Germany in 1:200.000. There is a copyright hint: © ehemaliges Institut
für Landeskunde, mit freundlicher Genehmigung des Bundesinstituts für Bau-,
Stadt- und
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/10/9 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
After I posted this message, I read another message suggesting
bicycle:push=no, which is a better suggestion than bicycle=no.
I still believe that something along foot:bicycle-pushing=no
Am 09.10.2013 16:32, schrieb Pieren:
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Michael Krämer ohr...@gmail.com wrote:
Another starting point could be the following (abandoned) proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Region and its
discussion page.
Bad idea. Replace region by
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Michael Krämer ohr...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding the idea itself I agree with Martin: I do not think something
large scale and fuzzy like the Black Forest should be mapped in the database
at all. If you think about this a bit longer it would totally be
Am 09.10.2013 19:13, schrieb Pieren:
I agree with you but they are already in the database, e.g. the Alps:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2698607
In fact that's a pretty good example for me: I think the line is at
least off by a few kilometers near the western part of the
2013/10/9 Pieren pier...@gmail.com
I agree with you but they are already in the database, e.g. the Alps:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2698607
yes, I am aware of that, but decided to ignore them. My guess is that they
will soon be broken and repeatedly be broken until at some
26 matches
Mail list logo
