Can happen where pedestrians and stopping are prohibited, but cycling is allowed.
Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 09/10/2013 14:55 John F. Eldredge wrote: Georg Feddern <[email protected]> wrote: Am 07.10.2013 19:13, schrieb Richard Welty: On 10/7/13 1:08 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote: I remember seeing such a "cyclists must dismount" on the narrow footway of a bridge over the James River, in Richmond, Virginia, USA. Not only was the footway narrow, [...] there's a cyclists must dismount sign for the footway along the Dunn Bridge between Albany and Rensselaer NY. well, if it is tagged as highway=footway you already have to dismount - otherwise it would be tagged as highway=cycleway. So where is the need for a bicycle=dismount here? I only see the practical need for a bicycle:dismount=no where bicycles are even not allowed dismounted. Georg Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging Bicycle:dismount=no is ambiguous. Many people are likely to interpret this as meaning "you are allowed to be mounted on a bike, but not allowed to dismount from a bike". I think bicycle=no would be clearer in meaning. -- John F. Eldredge -- [email protected] "Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
