[Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging

2014-09-20 Thread Peter Barth
Hi, starting after the SOTM-EU we've worked hard on a new proposal for indoor tagging: Simple Indoor Tagging. The Proposal can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging We think that this proposal is simple and holistic at once and ready to be used. Anyhow, we'd

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread Dan S
2014-09-19 15:52 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de: On 19.09.2014 14:22 Dan S wrote: for buildings: building=residential + residential=university + operator=* OR for sites: landuse=residential + residential=university + operator=* Note that the same scheme seems to me

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread sabas88
On 19 Sep 2014 16:54, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: On 19.09.2014 14:22 Dan S wrote: for buildings: building=residential + residential=university + operator=* OR for sites: landuse=residential + residential=university + operator=* Note that the same scheme

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread phil
Students accommodation is neither tourism or guesthouse, I would have gone for hall_of_residence. Phil (trigpoint ) On Sat Sep 20 2014 14:46:17 GMT+0100 (BST), sabas88 wrote: On 19 Sep 2014 16:54, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: On 19.09.2014 14:22 Dan S wrote: for

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread fly
Am 20.09.2014 18:32, schrieb p...@trigpoint.me.uk: Students accommodation is neither tourism or guesthouse, +1 I would have gone for hall_of_residence. Do not know if hall_of_residence is the right term. I know this accommodations for staff of hospitals (nurses) , too. Would be nice if

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-20 Thread fly
Am 20.09.2014 02:03, schrieb johnw: So the solution for a complex intersection is to have a signal_area area with an outline that intersects with all the nodes where the signal would affect the traffic? This would let the renderer use one icon, and still have the ways marked in the proper spot

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread Richard Welty
On 09/20/2014 12:41 PM, fly wrote: Am 20.09.2014 18:32, schrieb p...@trigpoint.me.uk: I would have gone for hall_of_residence. Do not know if hall_of_residence is the right term. hall_of_residence would work. i would have proposed the shorter, less formal term residence_hall which is what

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Il giorno 20/set/2014, alle ore 13:47, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com ha scritto: I still prefer (d) though if building=dormitory becomes widely accepted then I guess I shall have to swallow that loss for British english! I'm also for a specific value, if dormitory doesn't hit it for

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-20 Thread Lukas Sommer
Okay, I’ve adapted the proposal wiki page. We can propose to tag complex traffic signal areas _only_ using the area, and not to tag the individual traffic signals. That makes it easier for renderers to display only one icon per traffic signal area. However, I feel we should not completly exclude

[Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-09-20 Thread Tomasz Kaźmierczak
Hello all, I've posted the below message on the forum[1], and have been directed from there to this mailing list, thus re-posting it. *Idea* I would like to suggest making the *paved* key for highways (and probably other types of elements) official. Taginfo for *paved*:

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-09-20 Thread Richard Welty
On 09/20/2014 05:42 PM, Tomasz Kaźmierczak wrote: I would like to suggest making the paved key for highways (and probably other types of elements) official. Taginfo for paved: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/paved#values The above shows that the key is already being used, but the Wiki

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On 9/20/14, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-09-19 15:52 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de: I still prefer (d) though if building=dormitory becomes widely accepted then I guess I shall have to swallow that loss for British english! Wouldn't be the first time if ever:

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-09-20 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 09/20/2014 05:42 PM, Tomasz Kaźmierczak wrote: I would like to suggest making the paved key for highways (and probably other types of elements) official. Taginfo for paved:

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread phil
Dormitories are rooms with multiple beds, usually bunk beds and associated with youth hostels, certainly not suitable for student accommodation where there is typically one student in a room, maybe two but they are certainly not dormitories. Phil (trigpoint ) On Sat Sep 20 2014 23:12:24

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-09-20 Thread Tod Fitch
On Sep 20, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: On 09/20/2014 05:42 PM, Tomasz Kaźmierczak wrote: I would like to suggest making the paved key for highways (and probably other types of elements) official.

Re: [Tagging] University accommodation (was Re: Future proposal - RFC - amenity=dormitory)

2014-09-20 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 7:09 AM, p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: Dormitories are rooms with multiple beds, usually bunk beds and associated with youth hostels, certainly not suitable for student accommodation where there is typically one student in a room, maybe two but they are certainly not

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-09-20 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote: It might be considered duplicative, but what should a data consumer do if confronted with a surface=* value that is unknown to it (and the wiki)? We aren't talking human intelligence here where an informed guess is

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-09-20 Thread Tom Pfeifer
-1, because: Tomasz Kaźmierczak wrote on 2014-09-20 23:42: I would like to suggest making the paved key for highways (and probably other types of elements) official. Taginfo for paved: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/paved#values The above shows that the key is already being used,

Re: [Tagging] New key proposal - paved=yes/no

2014-09-20 Thread David Bannon
yes, agree strongly. Surface= is a good tag, provides important info but it is far too fine grained. Someone setting up a route cannot be expected to sift through all the possible values. Similarly, we may well have a chance to get the renderers to respect a clear, on/off tag like the proposed

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are named

2014-09-20 Thread johnw
On Sep 21, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote: As described in the proposal, the area is simply drawn around the approximative area that is affected by the traffic signals. It encloses everything, but shares nodes only with the incoming and outgoing highways. So the

Re: [Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging

2014-09-20 Thread Dave Swarthout
This looks like a great piece of work. Thank you for your efforts. I would like to suggest somehow adding access to your proposal (as a level subkey?). Many times there are levels in a building that are restricted for one reason or another and it would help to know which these are. From the

Re: [Tagging] Simple Indoor Tagging

2014-09-20 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 20 September 2014 11:11, Peter Barth osm-tagg...@won2.de wrote: starting after the SOTM-EU we've worked hard on a new proposal for indoor tagging: Simple Indoor Tagging. The Proposal can be found here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging Thanks for your efforts. Two

[Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-20 Thread Mishari Muqbil
Hi, Thailand has these places called entertainment complexes[1] that offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not allowed[2]. I