Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Improve Toilet Tagging

Javbw > On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Micah Cochran wrote: > > and adds the gender designation There needs to be another "gender" - elderly. In Japan, almost all public restrooms - at malls, service areas, public buildings, etc - have three designated toilets - blue

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Improve Toilet Tagging

Hello all, This is a proposal to make a few improvements to tagging toilets. This proposal adds a tag for the arrangement of stalls and adds the gender designation tagging on toilets that are within a place (where tagged "toilet=yes"). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

I didn't know about the practice of mapping the coastline along the baseline, AFAIK we don't map the baseline, only their 12nm offset (maritime borders) Vice versa, the practice is mapping the baseline along the coastline. But I think this is no a good idea, because baseline extend up a bit

Re: [Tagging] Pennsylvania colored Interstate detour routes

Well, I would use both ref AND colour.Then for the name what you propose looks good from my perspective.If you want to check or get some ideas you can also make some statistics with Overpass on how detours are commonly named.

Re: [Tagging] Pennsylvania colored Interstate detour routes

So if I use, for example, colour=blue in the relation, rather than have ref=Blue, I would have "name=I XX Blue Detour"? --Roadsguy On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Topographe Fou wrote: > In your case I would probably also consider to add something like >

Re: [Tagging] Pennsylvania colored Interstate detour routes

In your case I would probably also consider to add something like colour=green/yellow/... on the detour relation.LeTopographeFou

Re: [Tagging] Pennsylvania colored Interstate detour routes

Check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Ddetour On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Albert Pundt wrote: > Is there an established way of mapping detour routes such as > Pennsylvania's colored Interstate detours, as seen in this picture >

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

On 30 March 2017 at 07:41, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana wrote: > An exact limit between the open ocean and a sheltered coast is too arbitrary > as natural feature. It seems a political issue. You can use > boundary=maritime + border_type=baseline for excluding internal

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign relevant direction: relation type:enforcement vs. direction=* vs. traffic_signals:direction=*

On 03/30/2017 07:43 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Kevin Kenny > wrote: Obviously, if we are using the node for other purposes, we may need to disambiguate with stop:direction=* or

Re: [Tagging] "Living street" in Japan

2017-03-30 13:53 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > > there is defined tagging for these zones: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:zone:maxspeed > > Thanks, I will add that to the Japan tagging page on Monday as well. > Sorry, there's also another tag in use ;- source:maxspeed can

Re: [Tagging] "Living street" in Japan

> On Mar 30, 2017, at 7:00 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > there is defined tagging for these zones: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:zone:maxspeed > > Cheers, > Martin Thanks, I will add that to the Japan tagging page on Monday as well.

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign relevant direction: relation type:enforcement vs. direction=* vs. traffic_signals:direction=*

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > > Obviously, if we are using the node for other purposes, we may need to > disambiguate with stop:direction=* or give_way:direction=*, just as we do > with other ambiguously-named tags. > > I'm having a hard time

Re: [Tagging] "Living street" in Japan

2017-03-30 10:52 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > Could you make a residential=* subtag for the zone30? > > Highway=residential > Residential=zone30 > Max speed=30 > there is defined tagging for these zones: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:zone:maxspeed Cheers, Martin

Re: [Tagging] "Living street" in Japan

Javbw > On Mar 30, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Satoshi IIDA wrote: > > But there are some rare case to match "highway=living_street" such as the one > named "Zone 30" public highway/road in Japanese situation. The idea of using the living street for those narrowly defined roads

Re: [Tagging] "Living street" in Japan

sent from a phone > On 30 Mar 2017, at 08:58, Satoshi IIDA wrote: > > But there are some rare case to match "highway=living_street" such as the one > named "Zone 30" public highway/road in Japanese situation. in Germany (where this living street tag comes from), there's

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

sent from a phone > On 30 Mar 2017, at 01:06, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > > because UNCLOS allows countries to specify a baseline separate from the > coastline that encloses parts of the sea/ocean (thereby making those parts > internal waters of the country) . I thought

Re: [Tagging] "Living street" in Japan

Hello, Just a information. We had a similar discussion on talk-ja. (2016 oct) We could not reach the detailed consensus at that time. But there are some rare case to match "highway=living_street" such as the one named "Zone 30" public highway/road in Japanese situation. * thread: