[Tagging] aeroway=spaceport

Hi all, I'm astonished there isn't a description for spaceports yet, therefore the tagging differs widely : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Aeroways#aeroway.3Dspaceport - Proposals / Opinions ? IMHO amenity doesn't fit well, as it's just another kind of airport. Cheers, Thilo

Re: [Tagging] Link roads : the Michelin style

If you are thinking in the real quality of the link you will see link refers the most cases in the higher investment road, so in a real quality aproach links are refered to the major road. Salut i mapes yopaseopor

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

2017-04-28 14:57 GMT+02:00 John Willis : > Access:pregnant=yes actually the signs are not strictly prescriptive, it is more a kind request you should keep the space free for them, but you won't be fined if you didn't. It is not access in a strict sense, it is more socially

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

Javbw > On Apr 28, 2017, at 10:42 PM, Philip Barnes wrote: > > Bicycle parking is different, its not an area This is untrue. If you are thinking of the pipes or other lock points for 2-3 bikes you see scattered around a place with a few recreational bikers, yea.

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

Javbw > On Apr 29, 2017, at 3:16 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > sense, it is more socially expected that you respect it. I understand that, but if we are tagging what exists, then we should be able to describe it. People park cars _all the time_ in the big

Re: [Tagging] aeroway=spaceport

Hi, On 28.04.2017 20:45, Thilo Haug OSM wrote: > I'm astonished there isn't a description for spaceports yet, I think everyone interested in spacefaring must have turned away from the wiki when the amenity=skyhook proposal was rejected in 2008 by people without the slightest bit of vision:

Re: [Tagging] aeroway=spaceport , aeroway=launchpad

Hi Frederik, I think the main difference is that spaceports already exist (and are "on the ground") : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spaceport https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rocket_launch_sites In case of the skyhook I'm not so surprised of the denial, given the culture of denial without

Re: [Tagging] Tagging detail on Rest Areas

On 28-Apr-17 06:33 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: On 27-Apr-17 01:43 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: do we need the same tags for motorhomes ? Off topic. They get a mention on the caravan_site wiki page. I think they are represented by

Re: [Tagging] Tagging detail on Rest Areas

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, don't know of this. Can you give an example country/place? > Trying to find a best fix to 'my' tagging problem. > Self centred I know, but there are many 'distractions' with OSM mapping > leading in all sorts of

Re: [Tagging] Tagging detail on Rest Areas

On 28-Apr-17 08:33 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: Sorry, don't know of this. Can you give an example country/place? Trying to find a best fix to 'my' tagging problem. Self centred I know, but there are many 'distractions' with OSM

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 21:57 +0900, John Willis wrote: > I wish the parking lot tagging page took more of these issues into > account when discussing how to tag them. HGV (trucks?), bus, and > motorhome might need their own seperate parking amenity tags - having > them spring from car parking via

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Philip Barnes wrote: > Bicycle parking is different, its not an area its a thing to chain your > bike to. I would not call https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Radstation.jpg a thing to chain your bike to. It's an area imho m.

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

sent from a phone > On 28. Apr 2017, at 10:36, Marc Gemis wrote: > > reserved placed for cars driven by women. Typically in underground parkings. and for pregnant women (typically close to kindergartens) cheers, Martin ___

Re: [Tagging] Tagging detail on Rest Areas

I thought that did not matter. I just wish I could find an official text. I only find fora where people say that it is not legal. Sometimes its not possible, because the spaces are large enough for a mobilhome, but too short for a car + caravan. m On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Martin

Re: [Tagging] Tagging detail on Rest Areas

2017-04-28 10:33 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis : > Sorry, I think that in some countries you are allowed to camp with a > motorhome on some rest areas, but not with caravans. So you can have > camping:motorhome=yes and camping:caravan=no. > is there a difference when the caravan

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

I wish the parking lot tagging page took more of these issues into account when discussing how to tag them. HGV (trucks?), bus, and motorhome might need their own seperate parking amenity tags - having them spring from car parking via access seems really weird when cars are not allowed to use

Re: [Tagging] Tagging detail on Rest Areas

On 28-Apr-17 09:46 AM, Warin wrote: On 27-Apr-17 01:43 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: do we need the same tags for motorhomes ? Off topic. They get a mention on the caravan_site wiki page. I think they are represented by caravan at this time.

Re: [Tagging] Tagging detail on Rest Areas

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:46 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27-Apr-17 01:43 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: >> >> do we need the same tags for motorhomes ? > > > Off topic. They get a mention on the caravan_site wiki page. I think they > are represented by caravan at this time. > Sorry, I

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

2017-04-28 9:44 GMT+02:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > The disadvantage is that it lacks the where these things are in the larger > parking area. > Unless you map each as a separate area. there is the tag amenity=parking_space which can be used for parking spaces inside a bigger

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:43 AM, John Willis wrote: > When tagging a large facility I need: > > - car(understood) reserved placed for cars driven by women. Typically in underground parkings. ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

Am 28.04.2017 um 02:04 schrieb Warin: On 28-Apr-17 09:43 AM, John Willis wrote: When tagging a large facility I need: - car(understood) - car with trailer (usual in home renovation/building centres) -bus -"large" (truck/tanker/semi,etc) -motorbike (understood) -disabled car only -disabled

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

On 28-Apr-17 04:44 PM, Tobias Wrede wrote: Am 28.04.2017 um 02:04 schrieb Warin: On 28-Apr-17 09:43 AM, John Willis wrote: When tagging a large facility I need: - car(understood) - car with trailer (usual in home renovation/building centres) car with caravan -bus -"large"

Re: [Tagging] Proper parking lot separation

Am 28.04.2017 um 09:44 schrieb Warin: The disadvantage is that it lacks the where these things are in the larger parking area. Unless you map each as a separate area. That you have to do anyhow if you want to make any distinction. Unless you just tag different capacities. Tobi