Re: [Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

“tailor” sounds very much like a craft to me. On the other hand, it’s hard to argue with 1 tagged objects. >From the title of the issue, I assume that craft wasn’t being rendered before? >Which might very well explain why everyone used shop to tag it… From: James

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

Hi Paul and everyone, We decided to just get this ‘base’ tag done first. However, I could see cannabis=yes/no or something being added to coffee shops that legally sell, and maybe a full cannabis wiki-page if needed to differentiate different cannabis related things (I think a few States

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

I was one of the people who commented in favor of revitalizing the proposal. I've been using shop=cannabis to tag shops in Alaska where, despite the huge cost and burdensome laws regulating them, they are popping up all over. Even my small town of 5000 people, Homer, Alaska, has one shop open now

[Tagging] Shop=tailor vs craft=tailor

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3126#issuecomment-373963431 https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dtailor 10 000 uses vs https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/craft=tailor#overview 5000 Should we support both or just one(if so which?)

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

Almost, but the Lord of the Manor still exists and will be the one who benefits from mineral rights. Fracking for example. Phil (trigpoint) On 17 March 2018 12:36:36 GMT+00:00, Colin Smale wrote: >I have to agree with Martin on this. A Manor was an estate, which

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 5:17 AM, James wrote: > well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as > it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st. > Not to mention I know of a couple in Vancouver that have been open in plain

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

There are structures which are "manors" and I would't tag as a castle. As an example, a Spanish "cortijo" is the center of a big (originally, feudal) estate that is metonymically called "cortijo", too. The central building has a defensive purpose. Historians would say some walled villages are

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

A Manor is not a building, it's an area of land. A Manor House is a building. On 17 March 2018 19:40:31 CET, "José G Moya Y." wrote: >There are structures which are "manors" and I would't tag as a castle. >As >an example, a Spanish "cortijo" is the center of a big

Re: [Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

sent from a phone > On 16. Mar 2018, at 22:47, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I would not expect area where no plant is higher than 50 cm to be > described as forest. I think that using "landcover=trees" would be > misleading in this case. tree is about species, not

Re: [Tagging] windthrow areas (=forest destroyed by winds, =windfall)

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 08:44:10 +0100 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > tree is about species, not about age or height I am not so sure. Specimen of the same species of plants growing in one location may be a tree and not a tree in a different location. For example Pinus Mungo

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

sent from a phone On 17. Mar 2018, at 12:28, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> I wouldn't read too much into the wiki here > > Well, given that humans are incapable of telepathy and nobody who used > this tag bothered to reply Wiki remain as the best available source. I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:17 AM, James wrote: > well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as > it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st. > > The preposal looks good > For the US and Canada, yes. For some

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

I have to agree with Martin on this. A Manor was an estate, which typically had a big house where the feudal Lords lived, called the Manor House. The building therefore cannot itself be a Manor, and any feudal function has long since disappeared. On 17 March 2018 13:17:27 CET, Volker Schmidt

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 12:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hormann wrote: > I have mentioned this many times in different situations before: The > purpose of the tag documentation on the wiki is to document actual > use of tags. This derives from >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

On 17 March 2018 13:24:04 CET, Paul Allen wrote: >On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 10:17 AM, James wrote: > > For example, Netherlands, where some coffee shops also sell >cannabis (which may constitute the bulk of their business and be the >main >reason people

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

On Saturday 17 March 2018, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I would remove the part that requires a current administrative > function. > > > Please do not remove this. This is the wording that made me use the > manor tag for the Venetian Villas, which have exactly this > characteristic. I believe, but

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

On Sat, 17 Mar 2018 10:27:10 + Andy Townsend wrote: > OSM doesn't really have deprecated tags OSM has tags described as terrible idea that should not be used. > I wouldn't read too much into the wiki here Well, given that humans are incapable of telepathy and nobody who

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

Since there was no response so far, may I propose to deprecate using historic=manor and suggest on the wiki page to use only historic=castle + castle_type=manor instead. The reasons: 1. I can't see the difference in what both schemes try to symbolize. 2. There's a section on historic=manor

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - shop=cannabis

well shop=cannabis is going to be needed in Canada in a couple months as it's going to become legal nation wide with goverment run shops July 1st. The preposal looks good On Fri, Mar 16, 2018, 8:22 PM Michael Patrick, wrote: > Here, Cliff :-) > ( from

Re: [Tagging] Manor tagging

On 17/03/2018 09:51, Daniel Koć wrote: Since there was no response so far, may I propose to deprecate using historic=manor and suggest on the wiki page to use only historic=castle + castle_type=manor instead. The reasons: OSM doesn't really have deprecated tags, except in special cases (for