[Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node

Hi! Now I'm tagging with the more detail I can some cycleways in Catalonia. I do al the ways, and I cut and mark all the crossings. I do this with the formula highway=cycleway cycleway=crossing as a way (like I do other times with highway=footway footway=crossing for mark all the pedestrian

Re: [Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node

On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 12:05, yo paseopor wrote: > Hi! > > Now I'm tagging with the more detail I can some cycleways in Catalonia. I > do al the ways, and I cut and mark all the crossings. I do this with the > formula > highway=cycleway > cycleway=crossing > as a way (like I do other times with

[Tagging] weight limit in short tons

Hey there, as I was illustrating the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight article with some example signs and notes about pitfalls, I noticed that the wiki says here that the weight *must always* be defined in metric units. So, I also added a row in the examples table about the short

Re: [Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node

Hi yopaseopor, I think that     highway=crossing     crossing=uncontrolled is also the excepted way of tagging for cycleways crossings. You could add     bicycle=yes to that (crossing) Node to mark that this is bicycle crossing (,too). Hubert87 Am 26.01.2019 um 15:17 schrieb Volker Schmidt:

Re: [Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node

Hi! I don't think cycleway=crossing is a good idea because crossing=* key specifies whether a crossing has traffic signals, is only marked (uncontrolled) or unmarked. However, bicycle crossing can also have traffic lights or be only marked (and likely there are also unmarked bicycle crossings).

Re: [Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node

sent from a phone > On 26. Jan 2019, at 15:17, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > The fact that the road is crossed by is crossed by a cycleway is already > defined by the "highway" tags' values of the two crossing highways. +1, I would go with highway=crossing and crossing=type of crossing, on the

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 23:28, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > The only problem is the 'ton'. > > I n the USA 2,000 pounds > In the UK 2,240 pounds. > > Resolving this? units 'ton us' and 'ton uk' ??? > Why not use the terms that they are well known by when it is necessary to distinguish

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On 26/01/19 19:55, Tobias Zwick wrote: Hey there, as I was illustrating the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight article with some example signs and notes about pitfalls, I noticed that the wiki says here that the weight *must always* be defined in metric units. It is incorrect.

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On 2019-01-27 00:42, Paul Allen wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 23:28, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > The only problem is the 'ton'. > > I n the USA 2,000 pounds > In the UK 2,240 pounds. > > Resolving this? units 'ton us' and 'ton uk'

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On 2019-01-27 01:32, Paul Allen wrote: > I have no idea what a "cental ton" is.  Should I drink more covfefe? > Aahahhahahh! :-) Nice, and I had quite a similar reaction when I first heard about it (by an English gentleman): /"cental" /from the Latin "centum" (one hundred), because the US short

Re: [Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node

Someone proposed highway=bicycle_crossing [1]. The rationale is to be able to express crossings that can only be used by cyclist. m. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bicycle_crossing ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

The only problem is the 'ton'. I n the USA 2,000 pounds In the UK 2,240 pounds. Resolving this? units 'ton us' and 'ton uk' ??? Fortunately most of the rest of the work has gone metric. On 27/01/19 09:54, Warin wrote: On 26/01/19 19:55, Tobias Zwick wrote: Hey there, as I was illustrating

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 00:09, Sergio Manzi wrote: > I've also always known them as "short ton" and "long ton" and I agree > whith your choice, but... > > actually "short ton" and "long ton" are the terms used in the U.S., while > AFAIK Brits distinguish between "imperial ton" and "cental ton",

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

... but now I have a doubt... I don't find any referenece... have I been pranked? :-/ On 2019-01-27 01:45, Sergio Manzi wrote: > On 2019-01-27 01:32, Paul Allen wrote: >> I have no idea what a "cental ton" is.  Should I drink more covfefe? >> > Aahahhahahh! :-) Nice, and I had quite a similar

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Mapping disputed boundaries

As promised, I have opened the Mapping Disputed Boundaries proposal for voting. Voting will be open until Feb. 10. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Mapping_disputed_boundaries#Voting John ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 00:49, Sergio Manzi wrote: > ... but now I have a doubt... I don't find any referenece... have I been > pranked? :-/ > I thought perhaps you had, because I couldn't turn up anything on a google search. Which is why I said I hadn't heard of it. But I was puzzled when you

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

I have edited the units page to include the long ton. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units And edited the weight page to exclude the unit from the definition. And also mention the tonne (BE!). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight It makes a few barleycorns of