Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - tag:Police

Just wait for the end of voting schedule. 5 May 2019, 20:53 by bkil.hu...@gmail.com: > We're now at 20 unanimous approval votes. Do we still need more? > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:51 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick <> graemefi...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon,

Re: [Tagging] Handicap Parking Access Aisles

Hi all! I think a value of "access_aisle" is entirely appropriate and that it makes sense to be a footway, such as highway=footway + footway=access_aisle, though if there's another new subtype that would be a catch-all for similar features that would also make sense (e.g. footway=service). Access

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - tag:Police

The voting has to be left open for 2 weeks, in case there are some more people that want to comment or vote. But after that it will be approved if there are no new votes. On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:54 AM bkil wrote: > We're now at 20 unanimous approval votes. Do we still need more? > > On Sun,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - tag:Police

We're now at 20 unanimous approval votes. Do we still need more? On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:51 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 04:18, Jan S wrote: > >> >> So, I'm looking forward to your votes > > > Done! Good luck :-) > > Thanks > > Graeme >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Key:golf_cart

We're currently at 16 unanimous approval votes. Do we still need more? On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:00 PM Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > Voting has been open for about a week for the key "golf_cart", which > is already being used to define access for golf carts on highways and > paths. > > Please

Re: [Tagging] Whispering asphalt

Thank you for bringing street_vendor=* to my attention. I've been looking for something like this for some time now. On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:33 AM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > > 2 May 2019, 21:55 by amilopow...@u-cloud.ch: > > surface=whispering_asphalt or surface=silent_asphalt > > Please

Re: [Tagging] RFC - Feature Proposal - area of steps for pedestrians.

On Sun, 5 May 2019 at 01:24, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > The modelling intricacies are *w* over my head :-), > Mine too. but would it work as several blocks of "big" steps, modelled by Tobias' > system, divided by the normal stairs icon? > If all other ways fail, it would be worth a

Re: [Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:38:45AM +0200, s8evq wrote: > Another attempt at summarizing the current situation: > > How should we included the direction? > > - Andy Townsend suggested "Explicit start and/or finish nodes?", but I'm > afraid that's not enough to deduce the direction of complex

Re: [Tagging] Waterway tributary role

Hi, Am Samstag, den 13.04.2019, 11:48 + schrieb marc marc: > destination is the opposite, no ? > if river A go into river B : > in relation A : destination=B > in relation B : A with rôle tributary Destination helps human mappers to understand the data. It is optional.

Re: [Tagging] Waterway tributary role

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 11.04.2019, 13:48 +0300 schrieb Eugene Podshivalov: > Hi all, > Does anyone remember where "tributary" role of waterway relations was > discussed. > It is used quite often in Fance but I could not find any reference on > the wiki. From 2010 to 2012 the mapping of waterway