Re: [Tagging] Network-tag needs extension

A similar problem was fixed for brands by adding the key brand:wikidata . Maybe a key like network:wikidata could be introduced. Or, if the network has no wikidata, just use operator and operator:wikidata.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

I see that I have probably chosen an unfavorable solution to solve the problem described. Many seem to accept the basic problem: There is only one qualitative category for all kerbs with a height of over ~3 cm, although in reality there is a significant difference. I see two alternatives to the

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 22:48, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > On 20. Aug 2020, at 23:18, Volker Schmidt wrote: > Or maybe footway=canopy_walkway? That's a tautology (consider: footway=walkway) and can be reduced to: footway=canopy or better: footway=treetop -- Andy Mabbett

Re: [Tagging] Network-tag needs extension

On 21.08.20 14:30, Michael Schmidt via Tagging wrote: Maybe for all these options the network tag could look like network=* network:short=* network:district=* network:district:short=* network:state=* network:state:short=* network:national=* network:national:short=* Hi, In my opinion, this

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

sent from a phone > On 21. Aug 2020, at 15:18, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > That's a tautology (consider: footway=walkway) and can be reduced to: > > footway=canopy it is not a tautology, it’s a subtype, footway=canopy sounds horrible (maybe that’s just me?) > > or better: > >

[Tagging] Network-tag needs extension

Hello osm-taggers, I have some trouble with the tag network=*. Not with the tag itself, but I think it needs an extension. Maybe the most common usage for this tag is for transport networks. But I'm not sure how to name it right. Should it be the long or the short version of the network's

Re: [Tagging] Network-tag needs extension

sent from a phone > On 21. Aug 2020, at 14:33, Michael Schmidt via Tagging > wrote: > > OK, in this case I must tag the state network twice - for LSB and SKV... > > What do you think about that? I would prefer the long version (less duplicates of different entities) and just a single

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 15:03, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > sent from a phone > > > On 21. Aug 2020, at 15:18, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > > > That's a tautology (consider: footway=walkway) > it is not a tautology, it’s a subtype [We were discussing the suggestion: footway=canopy_walkway ] What

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 20:46, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > > On 21. Aug 2020, at 20:53, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > > > What type of footway is not a walkway? > > > > What type of walkway is not a footway? > > > > The two terms are synonyms; using them twice is therefore

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 21:44, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >highway=trunk_hghway > these are different because it would be a literal repetition. Do we tag: highway=trunk_road ? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

sent from a phone > On 21. Aug 2020, at 22:25, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > "public building" and "trunk highway" are also common terms. > > Do we tag > >building=public_building > > or > >highway=trunk_hghway these are different because it would be a literal repetition. What we do

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

sent from a phone > On 21. Aug 2020, at 20:53, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > What type of footway is not a walkway? > > What type of walkway is not a footway? > > The two terms are synonyms; using them twice is therefore a tautology. the term as I understand it is „canopy walkway“ not

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

Do we tag highway=motor ? Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 22 aug. 2020 om 00:37 heeft Andy Mabbett het > volgende geschreven: > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 21:44, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > >>> highway=trunk_hghway > >> these are different because it would be a literal repetition. > > Do we

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 23:56, Peter Elderson wrote: > > Do we tag > highway=motor ? Is anybody proposing footway=legs ? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] VANDALISM !

For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day ban for the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're exhibiting right now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850 jdd 3, please take a break. You have better things to do. I look forward to when you

Re: [Tagging] VANDALISM !

FYI; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism   Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct,   Deliberate adding incorrect data;   People who revert other people's work should expect to be able to demonstrate that the reversion was well reasoned and proportionate

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] VANDALISM !

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:36 PM Clay Smalley wrote: > For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day ban > for the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're exhibiting > right now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850 > > jdd 3, please take a break.

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 16:46, Volker Schmidt wrote: > The footway= approach isn't so good. A canopy walkway is more a bridge > type. > True, but you still have to walk across it! Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

footway on bridge construction, so highway=footway, bridge=yes seems ok. Canopy walkway is the term I see used everywhere, not canopy bridge. Makes sense to attach the canopy detail to the footway then. So footway=canopy_walkway sounds right to me. Best, Peter Elderson Op vr 21 aug. 2020 om

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

I couldn’t call a boardwalk a bridge either, but it’s used as a bridge value > On 21 Aug 2020, at 09:14, Peter Elderson wrote: > > footway on bridge construction, so highway=footway, bridge=yes seems ok. > > Canopy walkway is the term I see used everywhere, not canopy bridge. > > Makes

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

sent from a phone > On 21. Aug 2020, at 03:34, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging > wrote: > > in the united states it is Curb. in Germany it is Bordstein Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

Nederland: stoeprand (/stooprund/); officially: trottoirband (/trotwharbund/) I wonder what it is in Burundi and Iceland. Vr gr Peter Elderson Op vr 21 aug. 2020 om 09:39 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 21. Aug 2020, at 03:34,

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

The footway= approach isn't so good. A canopy walkway is more a bridge type. On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 00:28 Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 07:50, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > >> >> Or maybe footway=canopy_walkway? highway= Footway and bridge=yes seem >> essential for a