Off list.
This has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TAGGING LIST.
Desist.
On 25/8/20 12:50 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
In ID, on your profile page is, Other nearby users, and the home
location, map
the point is other locals based on my (our) edits know where we
(I) live, but come
There is a newly documented tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dvillage_swing
"A village swing (Estonian: külakiik, Finnish: kyläkeinu) is a large swing
that is designed to be ridden by multiple adults. They are typically made
out of wood and are common on village recreational
Hi
Andrew Harvey skrev: (25 augusti 2020 00:39:55 CEST)
>On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 06:27, pangoSE wrote:
>
>> The POI IMO cannot logically have an adress itself, its a human
>symbol for
>> designating something of interest within a feature like a building,
>park or
>> whatever. Adresses are
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 06:27, pangoSE wrote:
> The POI IMO cannot logically have an adress itself, its a human symbol for
> designating something of interest within a feature like a building, park or
> whatever. Adresses are specialized designations used by the state and
> postal service. You
>
> how could you change the definition of an undocumented tag?
>
Easy. It happens all the time, you just never hear about it.
___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
sent from a phone
> On 24. Aug 2020, at 22:10, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> But if you want to change the definition
how could you change the definition of an undocumented tag?
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Hi Martin
Martin Koppenhoefer skrev: (24 augusti 2020 02:16:27
CEST)
>
>
>sent from a phone
>
>> On 23. Aug 2020, at 23:20, pangoSE wrote:
>>
>> This collides with one feature one element does it not?
>
>
>it does not. An address is not (necessarily) a feature, it can also be
>a property
Since the tag has already been used 20k times, it is ok to make a page
which documents how the tag is currently being used by most mappers.
But if you want to change the definition Or other wiki pa a, or recommended
use of any tags, then you should use the proposal process.
- Joseph Eisenbweg
Hi Cj
Cj Malone skrev: (23 augusti 2020
23:56:33 CEST)
>> Not exactly a very user-friendly system though, especially if you're
>> only trying to review requested changes?
>>
>> & with somewhere between 300k - 600k changes sitting there to look
>> at, I don't think the chances are all that high
sent from a phone
> On 24. Aug 2020, at 20:58, Michael Schmidt via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> So, how to go on from here? My proposal stands.
you should follow the proposal process as delineated in the wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process
i.e. set up a page in the
So, how to go on from here? My proposal stands.
To substantiate this, I found on taginfo, that network:short is actually in
usage: 21k (btw. network:long: 34)
I saw, that there are votes, but I'm totally New to the tagging mailing list..
Regards
RE: "Would something like hindrance:target = lying_down or hindrance:target
= sitting be more clear?"
While this is somewhat less ambiguous, it looks and sounds quite strange in
English, and it's quite long.
How about "lying_down=obstructed", "sitting=obstructed",
"skating=obstructed" or
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 9:50 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
talk...@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> In ID, on your profile page is, Other nearby users, and the home location,
> map
>
> the point is other locals based on my (our) edits know where we (I) live,
> but come on
>
> don’t edit the
In ID, on your profile page is, Other nearby users, and the home location, map
the point is other locals based on my (our) edits know where we (I) live, but
come on
don’t edit the building i (we) live in !___
Tagging mailing list
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:34 AM Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> Does it really only use the changeset bounding box? That's good as a
> first-pass culling test, but I would be somewhat annoyed if my ROI is
> "Chicago, IL" and I get notified because someone changed Kansas City, MO
> and Detroit, MI in
On 24/08/2020 00.47, Jonathon Rossi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 2:22 PM Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 14:05, Jonathon Rossi wrote:
Andrew, how do you specify a polygon, always wanted to do that but I
thought OSMCha only supports a bbox?
[...] So at the top you should see a
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 10:40 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 15:27, Clifford Snow
> wrote:
>
>> I watch flagged changesets in my state, all changesets in my county and
>> all changesets by people I've flagged to watch. I review all edits of new
>> mappers to offer them
Just to clarify an important point. The hostile_architecture key was suggested
as a main/category tag to go along with specific keys (lying_hindrance,
sitting_hindrance).
Used alone, I agree that it would be very vague and could be difficult to
verify. I would say to only use it in combination
sent from a phone
> On 24. Aug 2020, at 15:46, Vucod via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> length and width keys on benches were refused because they judged that it was
> going too much into details
I don’t know who “they” are, but “they” can well stick with this opinion and
not map these properties
Hi
Vucod via Tagging skrev: (24 augusti 2020 15:43:37
CEST)
>Just to clarify an important point. The hostile_architecture key was
>suggested as a main/category tag to go along with specific keys
>(lying_hindrance, sitting_hindrance).
>Used alone, I agree that it would be very vague and could be
Wouln't it be more osm to describe visible and verifiable attributes of
features, rather than architectural design principles or supposed intentions?
Mvg Peter Elderson
> Op 24 aug. 2020 om 12:11 heeft Florian Lohoff het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 01:22:38PM -0700,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 01:22:38PM -0700, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> The term "hostile architecture" is too vague. As an alternative
> "anti-homeless" is also not precise enough. We are getting closer with the
> initial suggestion that the feature is to prevent lying down, sleeping or
> sitting.
Hi,
On 24.08.20 02:46, Paul Allen wrote:
> I'm not seriously suggesting we map them this way but speed bumps are
> technically hostile architecture. :)
As are cattle grids if you're a cow!
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, 01:48 Paul Allen, wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 01:27, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 24. Aug 2020, at 01:45, Paul Allen wrote:
>> >
>> > It's hostile to public urinators.
>>
>> agreed, but isn’t publicly urinating an offense anyway?
>
>
> In most
sent from a phone
> On 24. Aug 2020, at 04:12, Andrew Harvey wrote:
>
> You can tag the changeset in OSMCha as Good or Bad, but unfortunately no
> middle ground of just "Reviewed".
on the other hand, if you can’t tell whether it is good it probably isn’t
reviewed either...
Cheers Martin
Aug 24, 2020, 07:22 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2020 at 10:30, Martin Koppenhoefer <> dieterdre...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
>> Draw the bridge outline and tag it with man_made=bridge name=* and you’ll
>> see what I mean.
>>
>
> Thanks Martin - yep, it works!
>
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
