Excuse my ignorance. Junction=roundabout is the right tag.
I was just keeping the load down on the wiki server. :)
Richard
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, G Zamboni gd.zamb...@tiscali.it wrote:
I agree that noname=yes is not a good solution, but I don't understand why
roundabout=yes...
Pieren wrote:
Well, if it is really a roundabout, it is already tagged with
junction=roundabout. What we need is that KeepRight does NOT consider
as an error an unnamed highway with junction=roundabout.
Pieren
No Pieren
Even if it has a junction=roundabout tag it's still an error without
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
No Pieren
Even if it has a junction=roundabout tag it's still an error without a
highway=* tag, which is what I think Mike N. was talking about in the OP.
Not sure. It's a guess. Changing the highway category to road might
You seem a bit unclear. Do you mean name as in name=The Cyril Smith
Roundabout or highway=trunk etc?
I was referring to whether the name= tag is required. Thanks for the
answers, the consensus is that it is not required for roundabouts with no
name.
If the former, not all have a
Not sure. It's a guess. Changing the highway category to road might
disable the check in KeepRight.
highway=road is like leaving an implied FIXME=yes tag, according to the
wiki. I'd prefer the nonname=yes workaround, if any. I mentioned
KeepRight, but it turns out that KeepRight and the
Mike N. wrote:
highway=road is like leaving an implied FIXME=yes tag, according to the
wiki. I'd prefer the nonname=yes workaround, if any.
We need to be clear on this - Highway=* name=* are mutually exclusive.
You can't substitute one for the other.
Highway=* is compulsory, name=* is
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
But I've come across situations where the unnamed road is not a
roundabout, though. In one of these cases I used
highway=unclassified, because it was just a dirt road that was really
just a
Anthony wikim...@inbox.org writes:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
But I've come across situations where the unnamed road is not a
roundabout, though. In one of these cases I used
highway=unclassified, because it was just a
Please don't take the following as me arguing with you. I'm just
trying to understand.
No problem - it's a useful discussion and a hard question.
I think the bottom line is that one has to understand the actual
legal/use distinctions made by the experts, and then figure out how much
of
Here in Brisbane, we have a 'private way' going from the motorway out
to the airport. It is several km long, divided multilane road that
looks like a motorway, but is all on airport owned land. It is open to
the public, and you can get booked by the police for traffic offences.
However, because
You maybe ain't going to like this, but the usual distinction in the UK is
that residentials are (typically) 6m+ wide and have pavements/sidewalks,
whereas service is for urban roads which don't have pavements/sidewalks.
Richrd
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Well, that's how I would tend to see it, but it being in practice street
like and large and having a name makes it feel like it's fair to label
it as if it were a private way. I wonder if it really is a private way
and the
Pieren wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
noname=yes
Oh dear. What is the next step, noname=yes on all unnamed buildings if
KeepRight tells you it is an error ?
Nobody would expect every last building to be named. People generally
expect
13 matches
Mail list logo
