On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 9:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see an overly compelling reason to change the existing tag,
Me either. In my previous post I was actually trying to point out the
problems with the landuse tag, rather than advocate it.
I think natural=beach
On 11 April 2010 20:40, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely these should be tagged golf_course=bunker, or something.
I was hoping for something a little more generic since you can also
have beach volley ball areas that are no where near beaches, there is
also sand in deserts, and
2010/4/11 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 11 April 2010 20:40, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely these should be tagged golf_course=bunker, or something.
I was hoping for something a little more generic since you can also
have beach volley ball areas that are no where
For a while now, I've been drawing and tagging drive through lanes at fast
food restaurants with highway=service and service=drive_thru (and sometimes
also oneway=yes since it seems that the implicit vs. explicit tags debate is
not yet done). Does anybody think that this is a good idea that can be
On 12 April 2010 01:36, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
For a while now, I've been drawing and tagging drive through lanes at fast
food restaurants with highway=service and service=drive_thru (and sometimes
also oneway=yes since it seems that the implicit vs. explicit tags debate is
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:46 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 April 2010 01:36, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
For a while now, I've been drawing and tagging drive through lanes at
fast
food restaurants with highway=service and service=drive_thru (and
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I have indeed tagged a couple of these, using highway=service,
service=drive-through, access=private, oneway=yes.
highway=service + oneway=yes + access=destination
Pieren
___
Tagging
On 12 April 2010 01:56, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
In my experience the oneway is usually explicit, as there are arrows on the
ground.
junction=roundabout implies oneway=yes, which is why you don't need to
add a oneway tag as well.
___
Tagging
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 12:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 12 April 2010 01:56, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
In my experience the oneway is usually explicit, as there are arrows on
the
ground.
junction=roundabout implies oneway=yes, which is why you don't need to
On 12 April 2010 02:33, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Now, if we really want to start a flame war, maybe I should ask whether or
not to include bicycle=no :).
While your comment is tongue in cheek, most drive throughs have
height/width restrictions and usually don't allow towed vehicles to be
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 11:18 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 April 2010 20:40, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Surely these should be tagged golf_course=bunker, or something.
I was hoping for something a little more generic
Suggestions? As is, you can't use
On 12 April 2010 07:50, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Suggestions? As is, you can't use surface because that's only for
roads/footpaths (although strangely it's also used for
Why does the surface tag have to be limited to roads/footpaths?
leisure=pitch's - seems the wiki needs
On 12 April 2010 09:09, Steve Doerr steve.do...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Sand is not a necessary element of a beach in any case. In fact, the
original meaning of 'beach' was: 'The loose water-worn pebbles of the
sea-shore; shingle.'
All this means is that sand is assumed, since natural=beach
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
For a while now, I've been drawing and tagging drive through lanes at
fast
food restaurants with highway=service and service=drive_thru
On 12 April 2010 13:49, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Since a couple of people mentioned that service=drive-through is a good
value, then I'd go for this value too for consistency.
If you want to be consistent, use underscores not hyphens, eg
service=drive_through
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 April 2010 07:50, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Suggestions? As is, you can't use surface because that's only for
roads/footpaths (although strangely it's also used for
Why does the surface tag have
It sounds to me like we're getting back to the old argument about the
difference between land-use and land-cover. Unfortunately, tags for
both have been lumped together into landuse=*, (as well as some
natural, man-made etc) which is why the debate reoccurs so often.
Sand is a cover, not a use.
On 12 April 2010 14:20, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Good point. I assume you disagree with the use of landuse=grass, then?
(which is listed at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landuse)
It seems inconsistent with other landuses such as residential,
industrial, commercial etc.
On 12 April 2010 15:05, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
My personal opinion is that we should separate out the cover tags from
landuse into some other tag (doesn't have to be landcover). Not
because this is required, or it for easier searching, though they may
be side benefits. Simply
19 matches
Mail list logo
