[Tagging] Proposing additions to features

2010-11-01 Thread Paul Norman
I'm wanting to propose a number of additions to the highway=street_lamp feature, but I'm unclear on the process. The wiki only covers new tags, but the changes I would propose would add a significant amount of information that could be inputted. ___

Re: [Tagging] Proposing additions to features

2010-11-01 Thread Matthias Meißer
Hi Paul, normally this is not a problem as long as you point out, that there are changes to an existing tag. When ju just extend it, it is very simple. More difficult is it when you change the functionality e.g. move highway=street_lampt to amenity=street_lamp. In this cases you have to be

Re: [Tagging] Decorative pool?

2010-11-01 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/11/1 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com: What's the correct tag for a small decorative pool like this? http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=28.540045,-81.378424spn=0.000987,0.002575t=kz=20layer=ccbll=28.540331,-81.378715panoid=i0K7FBmQ_sgIfvQ9U6mOJAcbp=12,146.51,,0,2.8 I used natural=water but

[Tagging] How to tag landscaping

2010-11-01 Thread Paul Norman
Bring me a shrubbery! While doing some small-scale mapping, I came across an area of landscaping roughly outlined in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Landscaping.png Landscaping typically has small trees, shrubs, flowers, and other decorative plants. Being artificial, the natural=scrub

Re: [Tagging] How to tag landscaping

2010-11-01 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/11/1 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com: Bring me a shrubbery! While doing some small-scale mapping, I came across an area of landscaping roughly outlined in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Landscaping.png Landscaping typically has small trees, shrubs, flowers, and other decorative

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-dev] Super-relations or not

2010-11-01 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Peter Budny wrote: If you want this to be the standard way of tagging things, then we NEED to get the tools up to spec. I also noticed that Potlatch doesn't change the role from forward to backward when you reverse a way. (JOSM does the right thing, though.) Patches welcome. I'm not

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-dev] Super-relations or not

2010-11-01 Thread Emilie Laffray
On 1 November 2010 14:46, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: - super-relation support To anyone wanting to look at a nasty super relation, I would suggest looking at the French administrative boundary which is a relation of relations. Emilie Laffray

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-dev] Super-relations or not

2010-11-01 Thread Peter Budny
Marcus Wolschon mar...@wolschon.biz writes: I'm using routes in way-simplification to generate simplified maps for realtime rendering of larger areas when zooming out. It's quite a lot of work with LOTS of cases to try to sort route-relations that are randomly sorted with parts being other

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-dev] Super-relations or not

2010-11-01 Thread Peter Budny
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net writes: Peter Budny wrote: If you want this to be the standard way of tagging things, then we NEED to get the tools up to spec. I also noticed that Potlatch doesn't change the role from forward to backward when you reverse a way. (JOSM does the

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-dev] Super-relations or not

2010-11-01 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Peter Budny pet...@gatech.edu wrote: As far as I'm concerned, the difference in what's required to tag things is minimal between these concerns.  Therefore, wouldn't it make the most sense to choose whichever is programmatically the easiest and most flexible to

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - right left

2010-11-01 Thread esperanza
Voting page : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/right_left E. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging