Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

2011-01-28 Thread Andrew Harvey
2011/1/28 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc: My opinion is that natural=bare_rock should be used for solid rock and not for fields of stone/stony ground. The visible bedrock, even if it could be splintered and jagged. Okay, so this natural=bare_rock RFC should be used where there is one very

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

2011-01-28 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/27 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com: On 28 January 2011 07:43,  j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: Scree, however, usually refers to a sloping pile of loose rock at the base of a cliff, rather than being a general term for loose rocks. It's a little bit more general than that - a sloping

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

2011-01-28 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/28 Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com: Sorry for diverting the thread if this is getting too off topic, feel free to reply using a different subject-- I saw scree on the wiki, your explanation helps. The kind of rocks I'm thinking about are on the coastline, not on a slope, and are

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - natural=bare_rock

2011-01-28 Thread John Smith
On 28 January 2011 21:35, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: Yes, IMHO (I'm not an English native) this is not scree. I would tag them landcover=bare_rock (or depending on the size landcover=pebbles) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wave_Retreating_from_Pebbles.jpg Why bother