Re: [Tagging] second_hand shops
Am 05.11.2011 15:49, schrieb Tobias Johansson: I think it would be good with two values. only and both, to make a distinction between purly second hand shops and second hand shops that also sells new items. +1 (maybee second_hand=yes could subbstitute only -1 If you want to differentiate between 'also' and 'only' you will have to be precise. 'Yes' is ambigious for both cases. E. g. I would see 'secondhand=yes' as as shop which sells normally new items but also secondhand - in opposite to 'secondhand=only'. But while I would look for a furniture or clothes shop which sells second hand - I would look for a 'second hand shop' if I am looking for IT, electronics, games or other small stuff. At least here in Germany. BTW: A 'shop=car' mostly sells second hand also ... or only. Georg ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=disc_golf_course
2011/11/6 Johan Jönsson joha...@goteborg.cc: It will be nice with a physical tag for the place to play disc_golf. As the course it self probably could be found in a larger wood or park without any clear boundaries of where the course are it is probably best not to try to mark a whole area. I would try to estimate the area extension and hope that someone later might refine it in case of errors. You better have an approximation of the area instead of a node or a new type or relation that nobody parses. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=disc_golf_course
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist@... writes: 2011/11/6 Johan Jönsson johan.j at goteborg.cc: It will be nice with a physical tag for the place to play disc_golf. As the course it self probably could be found in a larger wood or park without any clear boundaries of where the course are it is probably best not to try to mark a whole area. I would try to estimate the area extension and hope that someone later might refine it in case of errors. You better have an approximation of the area instead of a node or a new type or relation that nobody parses. I have used leisure=park, sport=disc_golf for an approximate area holding the holes. It is really nothing that separates this area from the surrounding park, except for the danger of flying discs. Is this a method used elsewhere? Taking a part of a bigger area and subtagging it with sport=x. But as said before, there is no problems with introducing a new leisure-value. Then people can use the tag as they want, for a relation, an area or a node. /Johan Jönson ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - second_hand shops
Hi all, Thanks for all feedback. I created a Wiki page for the proposal, summarizing most of what we discussed. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Second_Hand_Shops Please add there or here if something is not cool. Ferenc [kempelen] ps: I reply to same thread to keep it in one place. May be a bad idea.. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - second_hand shops
Sorry to be late chiming in. About a year ago Sean Horgan, Craig Wallace and I thrashed out some ideas for charity shops. It just seemed wrong not to tag an Oxfam bookshop as shop=books! The discussion was fruitful although, reprehensibly, we didn't put anything in the wiki. I think Craig's proposal for Oxfam bookshops was the best: shop=books operator=Oxfam operator:type=charity If you click previous and next message from here you'll get the idea... http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-December/005982.html It now seems a good idea to add second_hand=only to the Oxfam bookshop tags. We did in fact suggest that shop=second_hand would be fine for a general second-hand shop, such as Cash Converters (if you ignore their other roles), or even for a non-specialized charity shop. What else should one put? shop=stuff? Note that shop=charity continues to do the job in practice - in the UK at least it's pretty clear what it means, though some charity-run bookshops and clothes shops will attract the tag too. Taginfo stats: shop=charity 660 shop=thrift 75 shop=second_hand 693 operator:type=cooperative 3 - L On 6 Nov 2011, at 22:42, Ferenc Veres wrote: Hi all, Thanks for all feedback. I created a Wiki page for the proposal, summarizing most of what we discussed. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Second_Hand_Shops Please add there or here if something is not cool. Ferenc [kempelen] ps: I reply to same thread to keep it in one place. May be a bad idea.. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
