Hi,
just seen that there is more FUD that needs to be adressed:
Am Dienstag, 18. September 2012, 23:15:57 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
* No variable parts in the key. This is essential as keys are used to
search for data in the OSM database. If a key comprises a variable part it
can no longer be
Hi David,
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 08:26:07 schrieb David ``Smith'':
Wouldn't that be...
access
access:conditional
vehicle
vehicle:conditional
motor_vehicle
motor_vehicle:conditional
hgv
hgv:conditional
...?
Actually, no. To quote: For access restrictions it is *allowed* to use
To echo Sir Humphrey*, my first reaction was beautifully typed. My
second reaction was as follows:
What attempt has been made to get editor support for this proposal?
Without it no-one, apart from the dwindling proportion voting on the
wiki, will ever even have heard of it.
Without editor
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
Am Dienstag, 18. September 2012, 23:15:57 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
Variable parts in keys will also lead to an undesired
proliferation of unique keys.
This is the only argument that is not completely broken, and it has two
sides: the Extended
Hi Ilpo,
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 15:45:44 schrieb Ilpo Järvinen:
* Avoids the requirement for problematic characters in the key such as
or
Which is a huge problem for data consumers that process XML using
regular expressions, and nobody else.
This is a false claim.
Hi Ilpo,
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 15:45:44 schrieb Ilpo Järvinen:
Variable parts in keys will also lead to an undesired
proliferation of unique keys.
This is the only argument that is not completely broken, and it has two
sides: the Extended Conditions proposal has a
On 19.09.2012 14:44, SomeoneElse wrote:
What attempt has been made to get editor support for this proposal?
Tagging ideas are often documented (as a proposal or elsewhere) first,
then actually used in the database, and only then added to editors.
At this point, a JOSM/Potlatch patch would
Eckhart,
Ich habe gerade eine Spalte für das Extended Conditions Schema zur
Beispieltabelle auf der Diskussionsseite des Conditional Restriction
Schemas hinzugefügt. [1]
(Warum hat das Extended Conditions Schema eigentlich keine Beispiele?)
Würdest du mir helfen die Lücken zu füllen? Du
I'm sorry. Here it is again in English:
Eckhart,
I've added a column for the Extended Conditions scheme to the examples
table on the discussion page of the Conditional Restriction
scheme. [1]
(Why doesn't have the Extended Conditions scheme it's own examples?)
Would you please help me fill in
Hi Ronnie,
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 16:17:07 schrieb Ronnie Soak:
I've added a column for the Extended Conditions scheme to the examples
table on the discussion page of the Conditional Restriction
scheme. [1]
(Why doesn't have the Extended Conditions scheme it's own examples?)
It
Hi All,
Despite some of the perceived benefits of this proposal being challenged
(mainly in regards to their relevance), the overwhelming thing that was
clear was that this proposal was well thought out. Ole looked carefully at
the feedback that was given during previous proposals and worked to
I'd like to ask all of you for comments and for missing communities:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=monastery
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi everybody,
it probably comes as no surprise that I am against the Conditional Restrictions
proposal and in favor of the Extended Conditions proposal.
My main reason is that I believe the Conditional Restrictions proposal is so
complicated it will kill mapping of those conditions almost
Hi Rob,
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 18:08:30 schrieb Rob Nickerson:
Despite some of the perceived benefits of this proposal being challenged
(mainly in regards to their relevance),
Except for one claimed benefit, I did not question the relevance of the claims,
but their validity. Maybe
Update.
First, If I were asked, is there a map showing access restrictions? ;-)
I've seen many showing speed limits, this and that, but I didn't spot
any global one.
I have been called by a Council secretary and I finally received an
e-mail reply too.
They asked what is that osm.org map? (I
Hi everybody,
it probably comes as no surprise that I am against the Conditional
Restrictions proposal and in favor of the Extended Conditions proposal.
My main reason is that I believe the Conditional Restrictions proposal is so
complicated it will kill mapping of those conditions almost
Am 19.09.2012 um 20:36 schrieb André Pirard a_pir...@hotmail.com:
BTW, I'm wondering about that forward.
If I understood you correct(!) this restriction should block traffic going in.
If anyone manages to get into the town without passing that signpost (don't ask
me how) he is allowed to
17 matches
Mail list logo
