I discovered* that surface=wood is ambiguous and may mean two very
different things:
1) paths with wood chips
2) paths paved with wooden planks (for example
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Bernatek_foot-bridge_%28Love_padlocks%29,_Krakow,_Poland.jpg
)
I want to tag in way that would be clear, n
2014-08-21 22:29 GMT+02:00 Andrew Guertin :
> Personally, I think the following scheme would work well:
>
> landcover=forest
> anywhere there's trees on the ground
> landuse=managed_forest
> where logging activity occurs or the forest is otherwise closely
> tended by humans
Good proposal, Andrew.
On 21 août 2014 22:29:40 UTC+02:00, Andrew Guertin
wrote:
>On 08/20/2014 04:58 PM, Richard Z. wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:45:30PM +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Sorry to raise this issue again but it really does need resolving:
>>>
>>> * for ensuring
On 08/20/2014 04:58 PM, Richard Z. wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:45:30PM +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to raise this issue again but it really does need resolving:
* for ensuring good data; and
* to prevent forest and wood being rendered as the same thing [1]
Currently the descrip
when there is no room to push you will stay on the cycleway until you can leave
it
> Il giorno 21/ago/2014, alle ore 17:52, fly ha
> scritto:
>
> Am 20.08.2014 04:45, schrieb John F. Eldredge:
>> Are you allowed to walk on the cycle path while pushing a broken-down
>> bicycle (for example, if
Hi
I think there are a few reasons, but let's start with the basics:
For two things so similar it's confusing to have two separate key
values: natural & landuse. IMO both should use natural (which trees are
of course).
Any description of their management/harvesting should be put into sub
ta
On 19/08/2014 22:17, fly wrote:
but 265-267 is wrong as 266 is not included. Either tag 265;267 or add
addr:interpolation=odd
I'm not clear with this example, do numbers 265 and 267 exist as
separate units inside the building?
In the UK, house numbers like 265-267 do exist where there is only
May be splitting hairs, but if your bicycle breaks down on a cycle-only
path, you will surely be allowed to push it along the cycle-ony path to the
next possible "off-ramp".
On 21 August 2014 17:52, fly wrote:
> Am 20.08.2014 04:45, schrieb John F. Eldredge:
> > Are you allowed to walk on the c
Am 20.08.2014 10:18, schrieb Holger Jeromin:
> Andreas Labres wrote on 20.08.2014 04:10:
>> On 19.08.14 23:17, fly wrote:
>>> but 265-267 is wrong
>
> Read as "tagging 265-267 alone is wrong".
+1
>> Disagree. addr:housenumber is the official number given to that building.
>> And if
>> it's "265
Am 20.08.2014 04:45, schrieb John F. Eldredge:
> Are you allowed to walk on the cycle path while pushing a broken-down
> bicycle (for example, if the chain breaks)? I have been on some bicycle
> paths where brush grows up to the edge of the path, so there would not
> be room to walk next to the pat
10 matches
Mail list logo
