Had thought about this myself as we also tend to look for camps with
kitchens.
So on a tourism=camp_site or tourism=caravan_site node or way
kitchen=yes
kitchen:stove=yes
kitchen:bbq=yes
kitchen:microvave_oven=yes
kitchen:fire_place=yes
etc...
Cheers
Ross
On 31/01/15 13:55, Warin wrote:
Hi,
On 31/01/2015 3:18 PM, David Bannon wrote:
On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 14:55 +1100, Warin wrote:
... I think the following things should be mapped to add information
to the map in regards some, mainly commercial, camp grounds that have
communal kitchens;
Warin, I recently was looking at Tag:touris
On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 14:55 +1100, Warin wrote:
> ... I think the following things should be mapped to add information
> to the map in regards some, mainly commercial, camp grounds that have
> communal kitchens;
Warin, I recently was looking at Tag:tourism=camp_site and thinking it
lacked a lot
The wiki page for temperature
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:temperature has been empty for
some time.. I've taken the plunge and made some entries .. see what you
think!
Any ideas for improvements will be gratefully recived. Critisium without
a suggestion as to how to improve, less
Hi,
Follow a thread on another forum (non OSM, but talking about side
issues) I think the following things should be mapped to add information
to the map in regards some, mainly commercial, camp grounds that have
communal kitchens;
stove top (no, not a bbq)
microwave_oven
fridge (or refriger
Here I diverge. If the hedgerow is an improtant part of the landscape
then I'd map it .. even if it is not at your required level of
'accuracy'. Reason: it is the relationship between the objects on the
map that is important rather than the absolute accuracy of any one
object.
+1
_
On 31/01/2015 1:47 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 30/01/2015 14:12, St Niklaas wrote:
> From: François Lacombe
>
> Since OSM editing tools aren't AutoCAD you can't be 100% precise on the
> geometry.
Exactly so.
Francois if you’re using JOSM you’re be able to work up till 0,06 -
0,04 =0,02 m ac
Hi,
Due to the large amount of key modified / created in the power transmission
refinement proposal, it has been decided to split it in 2 subsequent
proposals.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_transmission_refinement
I've already created the Power supports refinement pr
> Sorry, I was thinking of gas as a product (as in natural gas), not a
state of matter.
Confusing, so I proposed natural_gas for natural gas.
> I was thinking of substance=* as a category (water, fuel, oil, gas,
coolant, etc etc
I think we need (as often as possible) to tag separately nature and
Hi,
dieterdreist wrote
> thank you all for your comments, user:RicoZ, the creator of that page also
> agreed and has changed the description.
In fact, the creator of the above mentionned wiki page copy/pasted the page
I originally created to document the removed: prefix here :
http://wiki.openst
On 30/01/2015 14:12, St Niklaas wrote:
> From: François Lacombe
>
> Since OSM editing tools aren't AutoCAD you can't be 100% precise on the
> geometry.
Exactly so.
Francois if you’re using JOSM you’re be able to work up till 0,06 -
0,04 =0,02 m accuracy
No. Unless you can measure accu
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Tagging digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>5. Re: length= (François Lacombe)
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:13:38 +0100
> From: François Lacombe
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related to
Today's Topics:
>
>2. Re: Lifecycle concepts, "REMOVED" (althio)
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:58:27 +0100
> From: althio
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Lifecycle concepts, "REMOVED"
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: tex
> On Jan 30, 2015, at 6:51 PM, althio wrote:
>
> John Willis wrote:
>
>> Substance=gas
>> Substance:detailed:multiphase_gas
>> Substance:state=multi
>
> That is not coherent. Do you mean that (substance=gas) is for mainly
> gas or gas-only?
> If it is gas only (substance=gas), it can be multi
John Willis wrote:
> Substance=gas
> Substance:detailed:multiphase_gas
> Substance:state=multi
That is not coherent. Do you mean that (substance=gas) is for mainly
gas or gas-only?
If it is gas only (substance=gas), it can be multiple gaseous
products. But it is not multiphase.
And then state=ga
I think that when it gets really that complex, it's best to create a
wikidata item for the shrine (and probably a Wikpedia page as well, I guess
at least on ja.WP they are noteworthy enough to deserve a page), then
simply refer to that using the wikidata tag itself.
and maybe a comma delimited lis
Is there some decision on helping it all in one tag -
Btw - isn't it states of matter?
Substance:state= solid liquid gas (plasma?) multi
would a pneumatic garbage pipe be gas or solid, since it moves solid stuff (and
implies pneumatic or such ?)
Substance=gas
Substance:detailed:multiphase_ga
17 matches
Mail list logo
