y to draw/import them again, wasting its
time. So I'm rather looking for solutions which would not entail
deletion of data in that manner.
With regards,
Svavar Kjarrval
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On fös 14.júl 2017 11:08, marc marc wrote:
> Le 14. 07. 17 à 12:20, Svavar Kjarrval a écrit :
>> A street with a sidewalk on either side but no marked crossings:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/64.08800/-21.89846
>> (Sidenote: If one tries to route from no. 73
On fös 14.júl 2017 10:51, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> 2017-07-14 12:20 GMT+02:00 Svavar Kjarrval <sva...@kjarrval.is
> <mailto:sva...@kjarrval.is>>:
>
>
> A street segment with no sidewalks on either side:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#m
directions?engine=graphhopper_foot=64.14793%2C-21.96048%3B64.14875%2C-21.96216#map=18/64.14809/-21.96170
(Sidenote: If one moves the points much closer to the street of
Aflagrandi, the routers will finally "get it", but these are not the
coordinates people would utilise when looking u
tagging norms at the same time.
With regards,
Svavar Kjarrval
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
rences, I presumed the support was dropped. The corresponding
preferences entry is "message.add_primitive_to_relation" (set to "true"
to enable the warning).
After enabling that warning, I could add both duplicated ways and nodes.
Perhaps a similar thing is happening t
hey would need to run a process
to strip out the traffic rules which conform with their default traffic
rule. This could be avoided if we provided the defaults either in the
data and/or via a wiki page the routing engine authors can check.
- Svavar Kjarrval
On fös 2.sep 2016 20:54, André Pirard wrote:
> On 2016-09-02 22:20, Svavar Kjarrval wrote:
>> JOSM doesn't allow the user to add any repeats at all. Fortunately, it
>> doesn't remove repeats which were already there.
> I was showing nodes and Jo is showing ways.
> Repeating
way, using the same node
> (B) twice in succession makes no sense.
> I bet that JOSM won't be happy about it.
>
JOSM doesn't allow the user to add any repeats at all. Fortunately, it
doesn't remove repeats which were already there.
- Svavar Kjarrval
___
Since these are the names of the houses/estates, what'd be wrong with
using addr:housename?
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 26/03/13 13:13, Pieren wrote:
Dear the list,
In France, we have some private housing estates where the streets are
not named and the adresses are the housing estate name itself
On 01/03/13 15:17, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/2/27 Svavar Kjarrval sva...@kjarrval.is:
It works until the article name is changed in that particular language,
then it won't work for any language until it's fixed, if ever. Of course
one could argue it's very unlikely in the case
name is changed in that particular language,
then it won't work for any language until it's fixed, if ever. Of course
one could argue it's very unlikely in the case of a famous franchise but
what about less famous places that have a Wikipedia entry?
- Svavar Kjarrval
signature.asc
Description
On 27/02/13 12:00, Simone Saviolo wrote:
I'm honestly appalled by some of the criticism here. I think this is a
great proposal and will be very useful once both sides are solid, with
WikiData hosting more and more information and OSM linking lots of
objects to a WikiData node.
For the record,
. Not all business owners have time or
the interest to learn about all the available tags in OSM, nevermind
registering for an account and apply them correctly. Such a system would
have the potential to partially solve this problem.
- Svavar Kjarrval
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
with building=yes and
wait for a tagging scheme which can handle such situations?
With regards,
Svavar Kjarrval
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org
On 28/11/12 17:06, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Svavar Kjarrval sva...@kjarrval.is [2012-11-25 00:08 +]:
The RFC process has started for my proposal to tag the age groups
schools offer education for. More information is on the wiki page.
The proposal is at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Svavar Kjarrval sva...@kjarrval.is
mailto:sva...@kjarrval.is wrote:
Hi.
The RFC process has started for my proposal to tag the age groups
schools offer education for. More information is on the wiki page.
The proposal is at
https
classifications (ISCED) for the level of education.
So I'm afraid I will be voting against your proposal; not because it
is a bad idea, but because I think it should build on earlier
discussions and be integrated with them.
Colin
On 25/11/2012 01:08, Svavar Kjarrval wrote:
Hi.
The RFC process has
Hi.
The RFC process has started for my proposal to tag the age groups
schools offer education for. More information is on the wiki page.
The proposal is at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/age_group .
With regards,
Svavar Kjarrval
In Iceland we sometimes have companies parking cars in public spaces or
in private land after making a deal with the owner. The cars are marked
with the company and almost always have advertising signs on the side.
How would that be marked in your proposal?
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 28/10/12 03:04
I think most laws require that even emergency vehicles observe
restrictions like oneway streets. If there are any restrictions which
can be broken in case of emergency vehicles, I think they'd program
their routing software to them.
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 15/10/12 18:16, Eckhart Wörner wrote:
Hi
21 matches
Mail list logo
