Hello Friedrich,
in Czech Republic they have a similar problem: They have so called
conscription numbers, which are unique in the whole city and
additionally the normal housenumbers.
They use the key addr:streetnumber (675,742× used) for the number unique
within the street, addr:conscriptionnumber
Am 29.12.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Steve Doerr:
On 29/12/2014 20:36, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 29/12/2014 19:41, Guillaume Pratte wrote:
We are having a discussion on the wiki about the ‘varieté’ value for
the theatre:genre tag values:
Am 29.12.2014 um 21:57 schrieb Florian Schäfer:
Am 29.12.2014 um 21:48 schrieb Steve Doerr:
On 29/12/2014 20:36, Steve Doerr wrote:
On 29/12/2014 19:41, Guillaume Pratte wrote:
We are having a discussion on the wiki about the ‘varieté’ value
for the theatre:genre tag values:
http
Am 04.12.2014 um 16:46 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2014-12-04 16:29 GMT+01:00 althio forum althio.fo...@gmail.com
mailto:althio.fo...@gmail.com:
Second choice: I would like military. Is the overload of the key
such a no-go...
Third: I'll go for military_vehicles.
+1
OK, I've just merged both pages into Key:min_age [1] and Key:max_age
[2], added a note, describing why and translated both pages into
German. So for me the discussion is finished.
If anyone doesn't like, that it's now min_age instead of minage: Please
discuss it here or on the respective
Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com
mailto:acr...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from
legal minage (current tag min_age).
generally agree (there might be exceptions etc.,
Am 22.07.2014 19:28, schrieb fly:
Am 22.07.2014 18:58, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2014-07-22 18:31 GMT+02:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com
mailto:acr...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone! Target minage (age_group) should be different from
legal minage (current tag min_age).
generally agree
Hello,
I've just stumbled upon the two keys min_age=* and minage=*.
Both have a WIki-page and seem to mean a similar thing:
* min_age: It is used when the visitors of an amenity need to have a
minimum age in years.
* minage: It tells you how old you have to be to enter a shop, venue,
building or
Both variants (compound spelling and underscore) exist.
See min_height or building:min_level for example, which are used in
(esp. 3D-)building-tagging.
The highway-related tags minspeed, maxspeed and maxheight use the
compound spelling indeed, but they are way more readable than minage in
my
What about the homepage of the city [1]? There it says that The actual
name comes from the fact that our town site on a strip of Cherokee land
famous for the Oklahoma Land Run. The name stands for *Indian Exchange
Land*.
Cheers,
Florian
[1]:
Hi André,
Am 01.06.2014 20:49, schrieb André Pirard:
High,
During the discussion of this tag, it was said that a sure culprit for
incorrect noexit=yes tags, is a misleading phrasing
Use the noexit=yes tag at the end of a highway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway=* to indicate
Yes, I agree.
That recommendation was introduced yesterday by Pieren [1]. I strongly
oppose that.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for documenting best
practices. And I would say, that tagging noexit=yes on ways is not a
best practice.
In my opinion an acceptable comment in
Am 10.04.2014 15:48, schrieb John Packer:
I removed the use on ways from the wiki page.
The wiki is not for documenting Tagging-trends, but for
documenting best practices.
I agree 100% with this.
I also added the following phrase to the Usage section:
In the past this tag was
Am 10.04.2014 15:54, schrieb Pieren:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:10 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Well, there is one person against wiki fiddling and in favour of using
it on ways, who simply does change the just corrected version without
further discussion.
Well, consider that I'm
Am 10.04.2014 16:59, schrieb Pieren:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes
Am 09.04.2014 14:51, schrieb Ronnie Soak:
There can be a way that IS connected on both ends and still is a
dead end. A
road can end in a wall or a fence, where on the other side the road
continues.
There may be other tags there (barrier=*), but still it would be
Am 09.04.2014 16:04, schrieb Pieren:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Florian Schäfer flor...@schaeferban.de wrote:
An example where the tagging of noexit on ways is not sufficient is a
T-shaped deadend, where the crossbar is one OSM-way. At one end pedestrians
can pass, at the other end
Hello,
Am 03.04.2014 21:22, schrieb SomeoneElse:
fly wrote:
Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
Asking a slightly broader question, in what situations is noexit=yes
useful at all, except as a cue to subsequent mappers in the very rare
situation that one way ends very close to another one and
18 matches
Mail list logo
