Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica

2024-04-29 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
It has no sense to inflating classifications of every island in the word for being the most important road in respective island. If a neighbor garage is more quieter than the mine is not a justification to elevate road classification of one of them to compensate this difference. The highway=*

Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica

2024-04-28 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana wrote: > I do not understand your petition Put concretely: 1. Are Villa Las Estrellas, Bellingshausen Station, Great Wall Station and Artigas Base considered settlements in OSM? Should they be considered to have population=0? 2. If they are settlements, sho

Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica

2024-04-27 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
: sábado, 27 de abril de 2024 20:02 Para: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Asunto: Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 20:39, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana wrote: > there is opposition to using tertiary in Argentine bases Marambio and > Esperanza/

Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica

2024-04-27 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
I do not understand how is estimated a median point between unclassified and tertiary values. Chilean community has shown opposition to upgrade from unclassified to tertiary the access to Villa Las Estrellas/Frei base. The Argentine community has not spoken in this mailing list, but those I

Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica

2024-04-26 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
like a private area. De: Fernando Trebien Enviado: viernes, 26 de abril de 2024 9:07 Para: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Asunto: Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 03:16, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana wrote

Re: [Tagging] Highway classification in Antarctica

2024-04-26 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
About King George Island, if I am not wrong, the normal people can not reach the island from any ferry neither commercial flights from the rest of the world. You can only reach the island using a cargo aircraft. Inside the island you can not drive a motor vehicle, in the best case only can walk

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - juggling spot

2019-05-22 Thread Pablo
ink ?Le 22 mai 2019 00:05, Jmapb a écrit : > > On 5/21/2019 3:34 PM, Pablo wrote > > A new feature proposal which could be very useful for the juggling > > community. Usually, jugglers meet in specific spaces in cities (usually > > open spaces like parcs). There is often

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - juggling spot

2019-05-21 Thread Pablo
Hello, A new feature proposal which could be very useful for the juggling community. Usually, jugglers meet in specific spaces in cities (usually open spaces like parcs). There is often a day of the week which is choose to meet in priority. It s like a informal sport center. I thinks it s the

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-30 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
I didn't know about the practice of mapping the coastline along the baseline, AFAIK we don't map the baseline, only their 12nm offset (maritime borders) Vice versa, the practice is mapping the baseline along the coastline. But I think this is no a good idea, because baseline extend up a bit

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-29 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
By default baselines match with mean low water spring, meanwhile natural=coastline is tagged at mean high water spring. It would be good define some rules related to maritime boundaries don't agree with UNCLOS, .e.g. peruvian boundary extends up 200 miles away the coastline.

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-29 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
I don't know the Australian baseline, this is only an example. Sometimes the countries define a straight baseline that close a bay. Of course, Andrew have the freedoom to use, e.g. the tag description=* to do the mentioned difference. > No, it is not a political issue, the position of the

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-29 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
An exact limit between the open ocean and a sheltered coast is too arbitrary as natural feature. It seems a political issue. You can use boundary=maritime + border_type=baseline for excluding internal waters from the open ocean, according of laws of the country. Check the article

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-28 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
ch 2017 at 06:48, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana <jptolosanz...@gmail.com> wrote: A maritime waterbody are all those waters under the influence of the tides. You can review article for natural=coastline. The coastline should be placed in the "high water mean spring": https://wiki.op

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-27 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
El 27/03/17 a las 16:48, Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana escribió: >>/It is a bay of the Tasman Sea/Pacific Ocean. Ecologically it is a fully /> maritime waterbody. > > What do you mean by "maritime waterbody"? A maritime waterbody are all those waters under the influe

Re: [Tagging] natural=bay on areas

2017-03-27 Thread Juan Pablo Tolosa Sanzana
/It is a bay of the Tasman Sea/Pacific Ocean. Ecologically it is a fully /> maritime waterbody. What do you mean by "maritime waterbody"? A maritime waterbody are all those waters under the influence of the tides. You can review article for natural=coastline. The coastline should be placed