Re: [Tagging] Postal verses locational addresses

2023-09-10 Thread Snusmumriken via Tagging
On Sun, 2023-09-10 at 19:09 +1000, Warin wrote: > HI, > > I am coming across cases of OSM entered addresses on buildings that > are > some kilometers from the nominated address location. These appear to > be > 'gated communities', 'retirement villages' and possibly other things > that use some

Re: [Tagging] navigational aid relation

2023-06-14 Thread Snusmumriken
On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 09:26 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > Hi, > > Management Summary: >  In navigation/routing the point the router is routing to is the > nearest >  point on the routable network from the poi/address we like to > navigate >  to. The nearest point may not be a location where th

Re: [Tagging] Fuzzy areas again: should we have them or not?

2020-12-23 Thread Snusmumriken
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 09:55 -0800, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > 3) Archipelagos are partially cultural concepts but most often > represent island groups which are close together and share a > geological origin, as well as a human-created name. In OpenStreetMap > they are mapped as multipolygon relatio

Re: [Tagging] Tag:amenity=motorcycle_taxi not approved

2020-05-08 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 09:17 -0700, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: > There used to be human-pulled rickshaws, but these no longer exist. > They were take over by pedicabs / aka bicycle rickshaws, since those > are much more efficient. Not so. I've seen human-pulled rickshaws in Japan. And they probably ha

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

2020-04-04 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2020-04-03 at 20:53 +0200, Florimond Berthoux wrote: > For this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7wbi4wGbsg (Andrew's > example) > We're on the edge of tags definition : this a path limited cyclist, > where a mountain bike almost mandatory to ride there. Some features > help the cyclist

Re: [Tagging] Can highway=cycleway be limited to MTB?

2020-04-02 Thread Snusmumriken
On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 22:24 +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote: > just usually only a certain kind of bicycle. Well, that's the problem, if one can't travel on a certain way with a general purpose bicycle, then it shouldn't be tagged highway=cycleway ___ Tag

Re: [Tagging] Area country borders

2020-01-27 Thread Snusmumriken
On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 17:35 +, Paul Allen wrote: > I just encountered this video > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw44wHG4KOc explaining that the > border between Germany and Luxembourg, along the Moselle river, is > not a line in the centre of the river but is the entire width of the > river

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 13:47 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Redefining stuff without very, very good > reason seems to be a bad idea. I don't see it as any kind of redefinition. I've been mapping like that for many years. And as Florian Lohoff pointed out, so has many others also. _

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 12:48 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken < > snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>: > > Just to be clear, I'm not advocating that legal separation MUST > > lead to > > way separation. Just

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 11:21 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > Am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019 um 11:10 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken < > snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>: > > It is up to the driver. I think he can ignore most of the traffic > > laws > > in the cause of

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 11:32 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > 11 Oct 2019, 11:19 by snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com: > > My assumption is that pedestrian routing engine would stick to > > sidewalks and crossings and not to tell the pedestrian to cross a > > street where there is no crossing. T

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 19:53 +0200, Markus wrote: > On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 16:10, Snusmumriken > wrote: > > For example if you try to create a routing advice for a car > > journey. > > Let's say that the journey starts at Main street number 10 and that > > Main s

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 10:57 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > > 11 Oct 2019, 10:50 by snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com: > > On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 10:31 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > Am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019 um 10:26 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken < > &

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 10:31 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Fr., 11. Okt. 2019 um 10:26 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken < > snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>: > > A level strip of grass can be crossed by any car. With a big SUV > > you > > can cross curbs and so on. I

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-11 Thread Snusmumriken
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 17:57 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > Am Do., 10. Okt. 2019 um 16:10 Uhr schrieb Snusmumriken < > snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com>: > > For example if you try to create a routing advice for a car > > journey. > > Let's s

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-10 Thread Snusmumriken
ions are separated. > > Op 10 okt. 2019 om 15:01 heeft Snusmumriken < > > snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com> het volgende geschreven: > > > > > On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 08:38 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > DWG has been as

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

2019-10-10 Thread Snusmumriken
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 08:38 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > > DWG has been asked to mediate in a user dispute in Germany where a > local > mapper has chosen to represent a busy four-lane primary highway (two > lanes in each direction, and a double continuous line painted in the > middle which

Re: [Tagging] Was public_transport=platform intended to always be combined with highway=bus_stop?

2019-08-05 Thread Snusmumriken
On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 00:51 +0200, Janko Mihelić wrote: > And nothing renders anyway. So why don't we just start using other > public_transport values, like pole, waiting_area, and whatever we > want. We just start using them, and give them the "platform" role in > the relations. Rendering will com

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Ways divided by paint?

2019-07-04 Thread Snusmumriken
On Thu, 2019-07-04 at 10:11 +, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Thursday, 4 July 2019, Snusmumriken wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-07-03 at 14:03 -0600, Jack Armstrong Dancer--- via > > talk > > wrote: > > > I've always had the impression we should not create separa

Re: [Tagging] iD adding highway=footway to all railway/public_transport=platform ways and relations

2019-05-23 Thread Snusmumriken
On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 08:18 +1000, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 04:49, Dave F via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > Platform should only be tagged when their is a *physical* object of > > a raise platform, not just an imaginary area of pavement. > > >