Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-24 Thread John F. Eldredge
It is my understanding that Britain also uses the "true statements that 
harm a reputation are libel", but that it is mainly used against the news 
media.


--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.  Hate cannot 
drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.




On September 23, 2014 10:28:31 AM Mateusz Konieczny  
wrote:



2014-09-23 16:56 GMT+02:00 Mishari Muqbil :

> Even if it's the truth, it's criminal libel if you state it as a
> brothel. There's an interesting saying which you can Google that goes
> "the greater the truth, the greater the libel".
>

Libel is defined as "false statement that harms the reputation of
somebody/something".
Are you serious that in Thailand they have something like "criminal libel"
defined as
"any statement that harms the reputation of somebody/something"?



--
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-23 Thread johnw
Looks like Amenity=soapland is more and more appealing. 

 ><  those libel laws... ouch.  I thought the UK also had some pretty strict 
 >libel laws too. 

On Sep 24, 2014, at 1:26 AM, Matthijs Melissen  wrote:

> On 23 Sep 2014 16:29, "Mateusz Konieczny"  wrote:
> > Are you serious that in Thailand they have something like "criminal libel" 
> > defined as
> > "any statement that harms the reputation of somebody/something"?
> 
> In the Netherlands, this is the case as well. It is, basically, a criminal 
> offence to harm someones honour unless doing so is in the public interest.
> 
> http://www.wetboek-online.nl/wet/Sr/261.html
> 
> > In fact, I have the same problem with tagging Gentlemen's Clubs in
> > England. How do other mappers tag these? From the outside, it's often
> > hard to decide whether they should be tagged as leisure=social_club
> > (typically not...), amenity=stripclub, or amenity=brothel. In England,
> > brothelkeeping is illegal, so tagging them as amenity=brothel without
> > evidence might again be risky from a legal perspective.
> 
> I still wonder how other mappers deal with this.
> 
> -- Matthijs
> 
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-23 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 23 Sep 2014 16:29, "Mateusz Konieczny"  wrote:
> Are you serious that in Thailand they have something like "criminal
libel" defined as
> "any statement that harms the reputation of somebody/something"?

In the Netherlands, this is the case as well. It is, basically, a criminal
offence to harm someones honour unless doing so is in the public interest.

http://www.wetboek-online.nl/wet/Sr/261.html

> In fact, I have the same problem with tagging Gentlemen's Clubs in
> England. How do other mappers tag these? From the outside, it's often
> hard to decide whether they should be tagged as leisure=social_club
> (typically not...), amenity=stripclub, or amenity=brothel. In England,
> brothelkeeping is illegal, so tagging them as amenity=brothel without
> evidence might again be risky from a legal perspective.

I still wonder how other mappers deal with this.

-- Matthijs
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-23 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
2014-09-23 16:56 GMT+02:00 Mishari Muqbil :

> Even if it's the truth, it's criminal libel if you state it as a
> brothel. There's an interesting saying which you can Google that goes
> "the greater the truth, the greater the libel".
>

Libel is defined as "false statement that harms the reputation of
somebody/something".
Are you serious that in Thailand they have something like "criminal libel"
defined as
"any statement that harms the reputation of somebody/something"?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-23 Thread Guttorm Flatabø
Hi Mishari,

2014-09-23 16:56 GMT+02:00 Mishari Muqbil :

> I had an interesting conversation with legal today.
>

I'm assuming "legal" is a department at your workplace.


> Even if it's the truth, it's criminal libel if you state it as a
> brothel. There's an interesting saying which you can Google that goes
>

That is too bad for you in Thailand. Makes me wonder what other facts you
are prohibited from stating.

The people who will be liable under the Computer Crimes Act are those
> who enter the information, those who host and those who display the
> information. So for example, website A shows a map containing a POI in
> Thailand tagged as a brothel, a police report can be filed to have owner
> of website A prosecuted.
>

I understand better why you are concerned then. In reality it makes you
unable (/criminal) to map certain things because you are in Thailand. Even
if these "parlours" were to be mapped as amenity=brothel on OSM, a Thai
online map service could still show them as "soapland" on a map. One could
perhaps also argue that you as a Thai user perhaps could tag these as
amenity=brothel + brothel=soapland and not be libelous because you were
using the "International OSM" definition of brothel and not the Thai
version of brothel (which is unlawful and therefore does not exist)? If
every online map service in Thailand is to be liable for everything that
the map displays, to such a degree, it makes it very hard to use OSM data
in Thailand.

I've also been advised that Thailand is not the only country with this
> legal concept and that as we should be mindful and cautious of this.
>

I am pretty sure that for most free countries this isn't much of an issue,
at least not for the OSM user doing the tagging. Civil liberties isn't
where Thailand does best...

--
Guttorm Flatabø
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-23 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Mishari Muqbil  wrote:

> I've also been advised that Thailand is not the only country with this
> legal concept and that as we should be mindful and cautious of this.

But in OSM we map what's on the ground. Create a new tag like
"amenity=brothel_even_if_it_is_not_legal_to_say_it_is_one" or
"brothel=dont_tell_anyone"

Pieren

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-23 Thread Mishari Muqbil
Hi,

I had an interesting conversation with legal today.

Even if it's the truth, it's criminal libel if you state it as a
brothel. There's an interesting saying which you can Google that goes
"the greater the truth, the greater the libel".

The people who will be liable under the Computer Crimes Act are those
who enter the information, those who host and those who display the
information. So for example, website A shows a map containing a POI in
Thailand tagged as a brothel, a police report can be filed to have owner
of website A prosecuted.

I've also been advised that Thailand is not the only country with this
legal concept and that as we should be mindful and cautious of this.

On 9/22/14 19:49, Guttorm Flatabø wrote:
> 
> That being the case I'd say they really do qualify as amenity=brothel.
> It doesn't really matter that they're not officially brothels, or don't
> label themselves as such, that doesn't change the fact. Nor should you
> be liable in any way for mapping facts.



-- 
Best regards
Mishari Muqbil
Twitter: @mishari
EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-22 Thread Matthijs Melissen
On 22 September 2014 13:57, johnw  wrote:
> Yea, it's a brothel - but it is avery particular style of brothel in Asia to
> get around the laws , and AFAIK has very different customs than what I
> imagine a more european or australian brothel is. because of the type of
> service that is expected, I don't believe it meshes well with what someone
> going to the red light district in Amsterdam would be expecting from a
> "brothel".

I don't think brothels masking as massage parlours are a typical Asian thing.

I did some Googling, and I found:
http://www.massagewereld.com/en A chain of 'massage parlours' in the
Netherlands, Belgium and Germany
http://www.paradisestudio.co.uk/ An English 'massage parlour'
http://www.happyending.es/ 'Massages' in Spain
The internet suggests the same concept exists in Norway, where
prostitution is illegal.

So it seems this kind of thing is quite widespread.

I would prefer a tagging scheme that works worldwide, and I don't
think the term 'soapland' would be understood in Europe.

In fact, I have the same problem with tagging Gentlemen's Clubs in
England. How do other mappers tag these? From the outside, it's often
hard to decide whether they should be tagged as leisure=social_club
(typically not...), amenity=stripclub, or amenity=brothel. In England,
brothelkeeping is illegal, so tagging them as amenity=brothel without
evidence might again be risky from a legal perspective.

-- Matthijs

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-22 Thread johnw
Yea, it's a brothel - but it is avery particular style of brothel in Asia to 
get around the laws , and AFAIK has very different customs than what I imagine 
a more european or australian brothel is. because of the type of service that 
is expected, I don't believe it meshes well with what someone going to the red 
light district in Amsterdam would be expecting from a "brothel". 

Amenity is jam packed with stuff, so amenity=soapland seems reasonable, but is 
there an adult=* key? or a brothel=* subtag?

Javbw


On Sep 22, 2014, at 9:49 PM, Guttorm Flatabø  wrote:

> 2014-09-22 13:47 GMT+02:00 Mishari Muqbil :
> I realise that it's my fault for not being very clear from the beginning. I 
> think as John mentions, amenity=soapland is about right. I do suspect that 
> the establishments in Thailand are based on the same concept as those which 
> exist in Japan.
> 
> That being the case I'd say they really do qualify as amenity=brothel. It 
> doesn't really matter that they're not officially brothels, or don't label 
> themselves as such, that doesn't change the fact. Nor should you be liable in 
> any way for mapping facts.
> 
> However, amenity=soapland would be more precise and give more information, 
> and there's also a decent Wikipedia page about it. I'd say it's really a sub 
> group/type of amenity=brothel though.
> 
> --
> Guttorm
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-22 Thread Guttorm Flatabø
2014-09-22 13:47 GMT+02:00 Mishari Muqbil :

> I realise that it's my fault for not being very clear from the beginning.
> I think as John mentions, amenity=soapland is about right. I do suspect
> that the establishments in Thailand are based on the same concept as those
> which exist in Japan.
>

That being the case I'd say they really do qualify as amenity=brothel. It
doesn't really matter that they're not officially brothels, or don't label
themselves as such, that doesn't change the fact. Nor should you be liable
in any way for mapping facts.

However, amenity=soapland would be more precise and give more information,
and there's also a decent Wikipedia page about it. I'd say it's really a
sub group/type of amenity=brothel though.

--
Guttorm
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-22 Thread Mishari Muqbil
Hi Dan,

I realise that it's my fault for not being very clear from the beginning. I 
think as John mentions, amenity=soapland is about right. I do suspect that the 
establishments in Thailand are based on the same concept as those which exist 
in Japan.

Should I create an entry in the wiki for this?

On 9/22/14 14:05, Dan S wrote:
> 2014-09-22 7:29 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss :
> > On 21.09.2014 11:04, Dan S wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
> >> specific issue:
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
> >
> > please don't use shop=massage for this kind of places.
> >
> > I really don't want them to show up on a map next to Wat Pho massage just
> > because the map creator does not take into account some additional tagging
> > which says "yes, it's tagged as a massage, but this tag tells you it isn't".
> >
> > Additional tags can specify something further, but should not change the
> > meaning in general.
>
> The original message said this kind of place "offers bathing + massage
> services" plus the sexual stuff. My advice was based on that
> description. You seem to be saying that these places _don't_ offer
> massage services. I don't actually know which of these is true!
>
> Dan
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

-- 
Best regards
Mishari Muqbil
EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-22 Thread Dan S
2014-09-22 7:29 GMT+01:00 Stephan Knauss :
> On 21.09.2014 11:04, Dan S wrote:
>>
>> It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
>> specific issue:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
>
> please don't use shop=massage for this kind of places.
>
> I really don't want them to show up on a map next to Wat Pho massage just
> because the map creator does not take into account some additional tagging
> which says "yes, it's tagged as a massage, but this tag tells you it isn't".
>
> Additional tags can specify something further, but should not change the
> meaning in general.

The original message said this kind of place "offers bathing + massage
services" plus the sexual stuff. My advice was based on that
description. You seem to be saying that these places _don't_ offer
massage services. I don't actually know which of these is true!

Dan

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread Stephan Knauss

On 21.09.2014 11:04, Dan S wrote:

It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
specific issue:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage


please don't use shop=massage for this kind of places.

I really don't want them to show up on a map next to Wat Pho massage 
just because the map creator does not take into account some additional 
tagging which says "yes, it's tagged as a massage, but this tag tells 
you it isn't".


Additional tags can specify something further, but should not change the 
meaning in general.


Think of amenity=place_of_worship. They are all sort of religious place. 
If your map cares, it can distinguish between Buddhist, Christian or 
Muslim. But still it's a place of worship.



Stephan


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread John Willis
The name tag can be whatever it is, but making a amenity=soapland might be what 
you are looking for.  That way there is no confusion with massage places and 
clearly understood to be for adult services. 

Javbw.   

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 22, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Mishari Muqbil  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> To avoid having the word "massage" throwing off the discussion, I'll
> refer to it under it's legal name of "entertainment place".
> 
> I'll go ahead with the restrictions then, but the other issue is the
> specific legal classification that entertainment places fall under[1] as
> opposed to a regular, much smaller place which offer massages and have
> the same restrictions posted on the door.
> 
> You need a specific license to operate a "entertainment place" which
> makes it subject to zoning, taxes and other laws and an establishment
> that operates under this legal definition and license should be tagged
> accordingly.
> 
> [1]
> http://www.lawreform.go.th/lawreform/eng/index.php?option=com_homelawreformen&task=showtoc&lid=705&gid=6&eword=P&ename=Acts%20of%20Parliament&elawname=Public%20Entertainment%20Place%20Act,%20B.E.%202509%20%281966%29
> 
>> On 9/21/14 22:07, Dan S wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Well, that suggestion specifies access limits (i.e. only males age 21
>> or more), and if those are true facts and they're what you want to
>> indicate, then go ahead. The access limits don't really tell you if
>> something is soapy or not, but if you decide you only want to "imply"
>> that and not to state it explicitly, your approach sounds OK to me.
>> 
>> However, there's NO reason to use amenity=massage_parlour when
>> shop=massage already exists. Please use it. You said you want to avoid
>> confusion between soapy and family-friendly, and your age-restriction
>> works for that, no need to create a duplicate tag.
>> 
>> Best
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> 2014-09-21 14:52 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I saw that, but I'm not convinced it's the right approach as what I'm
>>> referring require a specific massage parlor license to operate as
>>> opposed to a regular traditional massage establishment which is more
>>> suited for shop=massage. I think it would be akin to saying a
>>> convenience store and supermarket can all be tagged the same way. Also,
>>> I'm not comfortable with using sexual as it could be libelous to state
>>> that something illegal is taking place in these establishments (for
>>> example, you won't do shop=convenience+marijuana=yes in most parts of
>>> the world).
>>> 
>>> How about something like a combination of:
>>> amenity=massage_parlour
>>> male=yes
>>> female=no
>>> min_age=21
>>> 
>>> This should be quite accurate.
>>> 
 On 21/9/14 16:04, Dan S wrote:
 Hi -
 
 It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
 specific issue:
 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
 
 Best
 Dan
 
 2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
> Hi,
> 
> Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
> offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
> that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
> them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not 
> allowed[2].
> 
> I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
> Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
> for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
> Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
> leisure=soapy_massage? :)
> 
> One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
> landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
> http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
> Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
> Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
> [2]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
> [3]
> http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
> --
> Best regards
> Mishari Muqbil
> EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946
> 
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
 
 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>> 
>> 

Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread Mishari Muqbil
Hi,

To avoid having the word "massage" throwing off the discussion, I'll
refer to it under it's legal name of "entertainment place".

I'll go ahead with the restrictions then, but the other issue is the
specific legal classification that entertainment places fall under[1] as
opposed to a regular, much smaller place which offer massages and have
the same restrictions posted on the door.

You need a specific license to operate a "entertainment place" which
makes it subject to zoning, taxes and other laws and an establishment
that operates under this legal definition and license should be tagged
accordingly.

[1]
http://www.lawreform.go.th/lawreform/eng/index.php?option=com_homelawreformen&task=showtoc&lid=705&gid=6&eword=P&ename=Acts%20of%20Parliament&elawname=Public%20Entertainment%20Place%20Act,%20B.E.%202509%20%281966%29

On 9/21/14 22:07, Dan S wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Well, that suggestion specifies access limits (i.e. only males age 21
> or more), and if those are true facts and they're what you want to
> indicate, then go ahead. The access limits don't really tell you if
> something is soapy or not, but if you decide you only want to "imply"
> that and not to state it explicitly, your approach sounds OK to me.
> 
> However, there's NO reason to use amenity=massage_parlour when
> shop=massage already exists. Please use it. You said you want to avoid
> confusion between soapy and family-friendly, and your age-restriction
> works for that, no need to create a duplicate tag.
> 
> Best
> Dan
> 
> 
> 2014-09-21 14:52 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I saw that, but I'm not convinced it's the right approach as what I'm
>> referring require a specific massage parlor license to operate as
>> opposed to a regular traditional massage establishment which is more
>> suited for shop=massage. I think it would be akin to saying a
>> convenience store and supermarket can all be tagged the same way. Also,
>> I'm not comfortable with using sexual as it could be libelous to state
>> that something illegal is taking place in these establishments (for
>> example, you won't do shop=convenience+marijuana=yes in most parts of
>> the world).
>>
>> How about something like a combination of:
>> amenity=massage_parlour
>> male=yes
>> female=no
>> min_age=21
>>
>> This should be quite accurate.
>>
>> On 21/9/14 16:04, Dan S wrote:
>>> Hi -
>>>
>>> It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
>>> specific issue:
>>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> 2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
 Hi,

 Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
 offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
 that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
 them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not allowed[2].

 I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
 Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
 for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
 Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
 leisure=soapy_massage? :)

 One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
 landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
 http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
 Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
 Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw

 Any thoughts?

 [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
 [2]
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
 [3]
 http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
 --
 Best regards
 Mishari Muqbil
 EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946

 ___
 Tagging mailing list
 Tagging@openstreetmap.org
 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 

-- 
Best regards
Mishari Muqbil
EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread John Willis
The word you are looking for soapland. Japan has the same "give you a bath and 
then have naughty fun" places called soaplands.  They are becoming rarer and 
rarer, but that is the term for them. Fits pretty well with the "soapy 
massage". Using massage is not right because they are more for adult 
entertainment or sex services than for massage. You would never go to them for 
sore muscles, but for adult interaction with the masseuse. (Like a strip club) 
or for services (like a brothel) 

Sent from my iPad

> On Sep 21, 2014, at 6:04 PM, Dan S  wrote:
> 
> Hi -
> 
> It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
> specific issue:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
> 
> Best
> Dan
> 
> 2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
>> offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
>> that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
>> them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not allowed[2].
>> 
>> I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
>> Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
>> for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
>> Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
>> leisure=soapy_massage? :)
>> 
>> One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
>> landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
>> http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
>> Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
>> Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw
>> 
>> Any thoughts?
>> 
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
>> [2]
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
>> [3]
>> http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Mishari Muqbil
>> EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946
>> 
>> ___
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread Dan S
Hi,

Well, that suggestion specifies access limits (i.e. only males age 21
or more), and if those are true facts and they're what you want to
indicate, then go ahead. The access limits don't really tell you if
something is soapy or not, but if you decide you only want to "imply"
that and not to state it explicitly, your approach sounds OK to me.

However, there's NO reason to use amenity=massage_parlour when
shop=massage already exists. Please use it. You said you want to avoid
confusion between soapy and family-friendly, and your age-restriction
works for that, no need to create a duplicate tag.

Best
Dan


2014-09-21 14:52 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
> Hi,
>
> I saw that, but I'm not convinced it's the right approach as what I'm
> referring require a specific massage parlor license to operate as
> opposed to a regular traditional massage establishment which is more
> suited for shop=massage. I think it would be akin to saying a
> convenience store and supermarket can all be tagged the same way. Also,
> I'm not comfortable with using sexual as it could be libelous to state
> that something illegal is taking place in these establishments (for
> example, you won't do shop=convenience+marijuana=yes in most parts of
> the world).
>
> How about something like a combination of:
> amenity=massage_parlour
> male=yes
> female=no
> min_age=21
>
> This should be quite accurate.
>
> On 21/9/14 16:04, Dan S wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
>> specific issue:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
>>
>> Best
>> Dan
>>
>> 2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
>>> offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
>>> that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
>>> them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not allowed[2].
>>>
>>> I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
>>> Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
>>> for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
>>> Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
>>> leisure=soapy_massage? :)
>>>
>>> One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
>>> landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
>>> http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
>>> Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
>>> Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
>>> [2]
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
>>> [3]
>>> http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
>>> --
>>> Best regards
>>> Mishari Muqbil
>>> EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>> ___
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread Mishari Muqbil
Hi,

I saw that, but I'm not convinced it's the right approach as what I'm
referring require a specific massage parlor license to operate as
opposed to a regular traditional massage establishment which is more
suited for shop=massage. I think it would be akin to saying a
convenience store and supermarket can all be tagged the same way. Also,
I'm not comfortable with using sexual as it could be libelous to state
that something illegal is taking place in these establishments (for
example, you won't do shop=convenience+marijuana=yes in most parts of
the world).

How about something like a combination of:
amenity=massage_parlour
male=yes
female=no
min_age=21

This should be quite accurate.

On 21/9/14 16:04, Dan S wrote:
> Hi -
> 
> It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
> specific issue:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
> 
> Best
> Dan
> 
> 2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
>> offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
>> that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
>> them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not allowed[2].
>>
>> I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
>> Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
>> for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
>> Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
>> leisure=soapy_massage? :)
>>
>> One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
>> landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
>> http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
>> Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
>> Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
>> [2]
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
>> [3]
>> http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Mishari Muqbil
>> EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946
>>
>> ___
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread Dave Swarthout
@Dan S — Good answer. I was wondering how to tag such places myself.

On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Dan S  wrote:

> Hi -
>
> It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
> specific issue:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
>
> Best
> Dan
>
> 2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
> > offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
> > that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
> > them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not
> allowed[2].
> >
> > I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
> > Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
> > for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
> > Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
> > leisure=soapy_massage? :)
> >
> > One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
> > landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
> > http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
> > Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
> > Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
> > [2]
> >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
> > [3]
> >
> http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
> > --
> > Best regards
> > Mishari Muqbil
> > EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946
> >
> > ___
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



-- 
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-21 Thread Dan S
Hi -

It looks like there's this tag, including a tag suggested for your
specific issue:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage

Best
Dan

2014-09-21 4:23 GMT+01:00 Mishari Muqbil :
> Hi,
>
> Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
> offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
> that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
> them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not allowed[2].
>
> I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
> Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
> for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
> Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
> leisure=soapy_massage? :)
>
> One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
> landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
> http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
> Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
> Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
> [2]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
> [3]
> http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
> --
> Best regards
> Mishari Muqbil
> EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946
>
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


[Tagging] (Soapy) Massage Parlour

2014-09-20 Thread Mishari Muqbil
Hi,

Thailand has these places called "entertainment complexes"[1]  that
offers bathing + massage services and quite often the expectation is
that there will be sexual services offered. However, I don't want to tag
them as brothels as prostitution on the premises is legally not allowed[2].

I propose to tag this as leisure=massage_parlour since that's what the
Thai English dictionary calls them[3] but I don't want it to be mistaken
for more family friendly establishments in other parts of the world.
Colloquially these places are called soapy massage so perhaps
leisure=soapy_massage? :)

One reason why they should be mapped is just how prominent they are as
landmarks in general. For example, here's one called Utopia
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/z1A8OOUw01E5Jc84Mff-1Q this one's La
Defense http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ho84IFdUxupke-6pwrWW3g and
Colonze http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/469ttdMVw4_1o3vkuvE_xw

Any thoughts?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#Ab_Ob_Nuat
[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Thailand#The_Entertainment_Places_Act
[3]
http://th.w3dictionary.org/index.php?q=%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%96%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%94
-- 
Best regards
Mishari Muqbil
EE32 64BD 7D1F 5946

___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging