I was playing around with taginfo and run into a strange set of tags in
northern Germany. These are barriers separating opposite lanes on motorways.
There are lots of them like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/118720124
Key/tag combos are :
barrier=beam_barrier
highway=axis
Am 11.07.2011 17:24, schrieb Zsolt Bertalan:
I was playing around with taginfo and run into a strange set of tags in
northern Germany. These are barriers separating opposite lanes on
motorways. There are lots of them like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/118720124
Key/tag
On 11/07/2011 16:47, fly wrote:
There was a discussion on talk-de@ about it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk-de@openstreetmap.org/msg85941.html
Thanks - I was wondering what visor=hedge meant!
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 11/07/2011 17:03, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 11/07/2011 16:47, fly wrote:
There was a discussion on talk-de@ about it:
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk-de@openstreetmap.org/msg85941.html
Thanks - I was wondering what visor=hedge meant!
I wonder if screen=hedge would be what they're looking
Am 07.07.2011 06:26, schrieb Gary Gallagher:
Returning to my original question. If we only do a building=entrance and
don't have a barrier=door tag would we apply something like
barrier:key=yes/no/number as entrance:key=yes/no/number?
So, you moving the barrier tag under the entrance
Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/07/2011 23:24, Pieren wrote:
I'm just trying to think about the way we are meant to map for the
blind. Currently this wiki entry
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_for_the_blind recommends that we
tag addresses not on the building but on the entrance. This is the
feature which a blind person needs to find. I was struck by
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:00 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.comwrote:
I think the problem is that the English word door has a more specific
meaning than the French word porte evidently does. The closest cognate in
English would be portal, which means door, gate, or entrance.
Yes, in
On 07/06/2011 03:35 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/7/7 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
And this case, Cour Delepine entrance, Paris:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:34 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
Could you explain or give an example for a door leading to the
outside of beeing completely outside (e.g. part of a wall or fence)
that is not a gate? IMHO gate does comprise doors (especially
doors that lead to
On 06/07/2011 21:43, Pieren wrote:
The Passage de la Boule Blanche is closed by a door. Or would you
qualify this a gate ?
Speaking entirely for myself, I'd call that a gate.
Cheers,
Andy
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
2011/7/6 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
http://maps.google.ch/maps?q=paris,+Passage+de+la+Boule+Blanchehl=frll=48.85134,2.37229spn=0.001273,0.001982sll=48.853082,2.370364sspn=0.002545,0.003964t=kz=19layer=ccbll=48.851346,2.37229panoid=M3k9nxcYnp2fn3fpfeP39Qcbp=12,33.63,,0,-2.44
The Passage de la
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:10 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, I'd call that a gate.
Cheers,
Martin
And this case, Cour Delepine entrance, Paris:
2011/7/7 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
And this case, Cour Delepine entrance, Paris:
On 06/07/2011 23:24, Pieren wrote:
http://maps.google.ch/maps?q=paris,+Cour+Delepinehl=frll=48.853267,2.376236spn=0.001272,0.001982sll=48.853393,2.376266sspn=0.002527,0.003964t=kz=19layer=ccbll=48.853272,2.376236panoid=QaPsmt8GresisBm_udoo9wcbp=12,4.87,,0,10.23
Returning to my original question. If we only do a building=entrance and
don't have a barrier=door tag would we apply something like
barrier:key=yes/no/number as entrance:key=yes/no/number?
regards
Gary
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 13:03 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/7/2 Gary Gallagher
2011/7/1 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
thank you for this comment Paul. I overlooked this and will change it
the next days. I guess the thing on the pic is a kind of guard_rail
(probably could be subtagged). I didn't put this picture in myself and
it is not showing what I had in mind
2011/7/1 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
On 06/30/2011 05:35 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
How about lane dividers? This is an example below, though where I'm
thinking of them they actually divide a couple of lanes for about a km
or so - no lane changing allowed at that point.
2011/7/2 Gary Gallagher g.null.dev...@gmail.com:
I like the proposal. I'm always coming across barriers I can't adequately
tag. The section that also caught my eye was the bit near the end about
subtags like barrier:key=yes/no/number. I've been trying to tag in useful
ways for the blind and
2011/7/3 Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com:
Maybe these are better examples of what I meant, though I have seen
the others in use in the same role.
http://www.zjeastsea.com/en/lane-divider.html
http://www.roadstud.com.cn/road-studs/61.html
I wouldn't call them bollards - bollard implies to me
Am 01.07.2011 17:47, schrieb SomeoneElse:
On 01/07/2011 16:49, fly wrote:
A check on data how often these values are already used would be
helpful, maybe we can accept some without voting.
You mean like:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/barrier#values
Thanks,
Seems to me that there
2011/7/4 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Am 04.07.2011 13:03, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/7/2 Gary Gallagher g.null.dev...@gmail.com:
I like the proposal. I'm always coming across barriers I can't adequately
tag. The section that also caught my eye was the bit near the end about
subtags
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
add it to the proposal ?
I do not know/find barrier=door. Didi I miss something or do you want to
I do not want to add it, because I think that building=entrance does
I'm using barrier=door from time to time
2011/7/4 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:51 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm using barrier=door from time to time when a private service street is
closed by a door (not a gate) or a named path or footway, again when it is
closed physically by a door
Tobias Knerr schrieb:
Erik Johansson wrote:
I think turnstiles and full height turnstiles should be the
barrier=turnstile, add some extra tag to differentiate them.
I'm convinced that this point wouldn't come up if the English language
didn't happen to use the term turnstile for both
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:37 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
Erik Johansson wrote:
I think turnstiles and full height turnstiles should be the
barrier=turnstile, add some extra tag to differentiate them.
This has been discussed before, and in my opinion they are sufficiently
different (how they look, whether you can jump over them, whether they
tend to
Yes this is a great proposal. I've come across many examples where I've
been unable to adequately tag ways. I like the extra stuff that helps
tag entrances which has potential for tagging for the blind
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 19:37 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old
Am 30.06.2011 19:37, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
On 01/07/2011 16:49, fly wrote:
A check on data how often these values are already used would be
helpful, maybe we can accept some without voting.
You mean like:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/barrier#values
?
___
Tagging mailing list
I like the proposal. I'm always coming across barriers I can't adequately
tag. The section that also caught my eye was the bit near the end about
subtags like barrier:key=yes/no/number. I've been trying to tag in useful
ways for the blind and was wondering whether this sort of subtag could be
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
Cheers,
Martin
On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get
this
to a more definite status:
2011/6/30 Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org:
The rope barrier pictured is actually a crash fence commonly used as a
cost saving measure on motorway medians in the US.
thank you for this comment Paul. I overlooked this and will change it
the next days. I guess the thing on the pic is a kind of
On 6/30/2011 7:13 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/6/30 Paul Johnsonba...@ursamundi.org:
The rope barrier pictured is actually a crash fence commonly used as a
cost saving measure on motorway medians in the US.
thank you for this comment Paul. I overlooked this and will change it
the next
On 6/30/2011 1:37 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
On 06/30/2011 02:50 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get
How about lane dividers? This is an example below, though where I'm
thinking of them they actually divide a couple of lanes for about a km
or so - no lane changing allowed at that point.
http://www.ingalcivil.com.au/reboundable_lane_divider.html
Stephen
On 1 July 2011 03:37, M∡rtin
aul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 06/30/2011 02:50 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now
On 6/30/11 9:06 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
This may be a factor of how low off the ground the bottom row of cables are
located. Here in Tennessee, solid guardrails are mostly used. Cable barriers,
when used, tend to have the bottom cable about the same distance off of the
ground as the
On 06/30/2011 05:35 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
How about lane dividers? This is an example below, though where I'm
thinking of them they actually divide a couple of lanes for about a km
or so - no lane changing allowed at that point.
http://www.ingalcivil.com.au/reboundable_lane_divider.html
42 matches
Mail list logo
