On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Hubert wrote:
> Mo 03.11.2014 20:18 fly :
>
> > Either just let your proposal exist and start using it or simply use the
> lanes:-tagging like
> >
> > biycle:lanes=yes|yes|designated
>
> Can I do that, even if the proposal was rejected?
> It would leave the proble
Hallo,
Di 04.11.2014 09:03 Martin Vonwald :
> On the other hand, if we are looking at junctions with multiple (turning)
lanes and multiple
> cycle lanes, then we should use the :lanes tagging in addition(!) to the
good old cycleway
> tagging.
+1. That seem a like good solution. But it still do
Hi!
2014-11-03 18:47 GMT+01:00 Hubert :
> But the question is, whether we should abandon cycleway=* tagging on the
> main road in favor for, let us say, cycleway:lanes=, or do we allow lane
> tagging in addition to the well established cycleway=* scheme.
>
As I wrote the :lanes proposal I'm obvio
Am 03.11.2014 um 18:56 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> IMHO cycleway=* should stay.
+1
> cycleway:lanes= would be (is?)
> significantly more complex and it may be used in addition, not instead
> of cycleway=*.
so far, it is bicycle:lanes and no real lane-Tagging for the sidepath
(cycleway=track + si
Am 02.11.2014 um 09:14 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> " I'd argue that tracks are probably a distinct roadway anyway, given
> that they're bollard or curb separated and lane changes to the adjacent
> roadway is illegal."
>
> Yes, for me cycleway=track is equivalent of fixme="mark highway=cycleway
>
koni...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Samstag, 1. November 2014 22:34
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] sub key for cycle ways
>
>
>
> "2. the cases where the bike lane is in the middle of the road is limited"
> - bicycle lane in
From: Mateusz Konieczny [mailto:matkoni...@gmail.com]
Sent: Samstag, 1. November 2014 22:34
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] sub key for cycle ways
"2. the cases where the bike lane is in the middle of the road is limited" -
bicycle lane in
the
" I'd argue that tracks are probably a distinct roadway anyway, given that
they're bollard or curb separated and lane changes to the adjacent roadway
is illegal."
Yes, for me cycleway=track is equivalent of fixme="mark highway=cycleway
near this road".
2014-11-02 2:17 GMT+01:00 Paul Johnson :
>
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
> "2. the cases where the bike lane is in the middle of the road is
> limited" - bicycle lane in
> the middle is standard before advanced stop line (to be on the left side
> of right-turn) -
> at least in Poland
>
Not unheard of to common
"2. the cases where the bike lane is in the middle of the road is limited"
- bicycle lane in
the middle is standard before advanced stop line (to be on the left side of
right-turn) -
at least in Poland
"3. “cycleway=track” would look funny using that scheme" - cycleway=track
is anyway
not compatib
Sure, but I think it is best to do that in addition and not instead of
cycleway=* tagging. For one it takes more effort, 2. the cases where the
bike lane is in the middle of the road is limited. (not counting parking
lanes). 3. cycleway=track would look funny using that scheme. Also adding
more
Can we move towards using the lanes tagging used for every other mode
already? It's much more precise and can deal with situations like where
the bike lane is not the extreme left/right lane.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Hubert wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> since a new main value for UK:advisary cyc
Hallo,
since a new main value for UK:advisary cyclelane, DE:Schutzstreifen,
A:Mehrzweckstreifen, NL:fietsstrook met onderbroken streep, F:bande cyclable
conseillée et réservée, CZ:cyklistický jízdní pruh didnt get approved, Im
thinking of introducing a sub key for that. (Like many of you already
13 matches
Mail list logo
