OK, reopening this thread: previously there were 2 or 3 people
initially in favor of using bbq=yes (already used about 200 times) to
specify that "there is a permanently installed barbecue grill at this
feature", for use on picnic sites and campsites.
However, later there were 2 people who
Re: > basic picnic tables where you can provide your own mini grill
It looks like we can propose "bring_own_bbq=yes" for that situation
Re: > some fixed on a post grills
Do you think this should be "bbq=yes" or "barbecue_grill=yes"?
-Joseph
On 7/6/19, Nita S. wrote:
> One caravan park I am
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 16:27, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
>
> Should we use bbq=yes or barbecue_grill=yes with campsites, caravan
> sites and camp pitches to specify the presence of a grill that can be
> used for bbq / grilling?
>
I would go for barbecue_grill=yes to show that there is "something"
Another user added bring_own_bbq=yes as a suggestion on the amenity=bbq page
But, getting back to the original question, which I need answered for
my draft proposal Proposed_features/Campsite_properties:
Should we use bbq=yes or barbecue_grill=yes with campsites, caravan
sites and camp pitches
On 06/07/19 02:28, Jmapb via Tagging wrote:
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most
On 7/5/2019 10:56 AM, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
This is
I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.
There might be times when there is "bbq=yes" and
Le 03.07.19 à 17:17, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
> bbq:grills=yes/no/1+
or device=* (already approved tag do describe the number
of same devices) ?
> bbq:bring_own=yes/no
or equiped=yes/no : the bbq is always there or it's an allowed
but not-equiped area and you need to bring your own ?
On 7/2/2019 8:20 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 02.07.19 à 13:38, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit :
There are two similar property tags that describe the presence of a
barbecue (BBQ) grill at another feature such as a campsite or picnic
site.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bbq
Le 02.07.19 à 13:38, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit :
> The similar feature tag is amenity=bbq
>
> Is there a reason to pick one of these two tags over the other?
I like having the same string between the main tag for the device
and the key for the caracteristic of a site having this device.
so imho
sent from a phone
> On 2. Jul 2019, at 13:38, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
> Is there a reason to pick one of these two tags over the other? I'd
> like to know what to suggest for use with tourism=camp_pitch
I would prefer „bbq“ because it is the analogous key for the established
amenity=bbq
There are two similar property tags that describe the presence of a
barbecue (BBQ) grill at another feature such as a campsite or picnic
site.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bbq
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barbecue_grill
If you check taghistory.raifer.tech it's clear that
12 matches
Mail list logo
