* johnw jo...@mac.com [2014-11-28 13:11 +0900]:
On Nov 28, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
the basic scheme doesn't require anything new or unusual in
route relation tagging, just care and consistency.
I look forward to seeing his RFC page then ^_^
Well, the
* Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net [2014-11-27 11:09 -0500]:
actually, specifying the shield with a URL for an svg file was an older
approach.
And, I should note, one that I consciously did not use. I believe it was
Richard Weait who pointed out that grabbing an arbitrary image, chosen by
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:11 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
That looks really good. Some graphic designers need to remake the shields
for icon size (bigger lettering, details ignored), but the system of
putting on the roads looks great.
amItheOnlyOneHere.png that thinks, in the vast
On 11/28/14 2:26 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:11 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com
mailto:jo...@mac.com wrote:
That looks really good. Some graphic designers need to remake the
shields for icon size (bigger lettering, details ignored), but the
system of putting on the
I've been trying to understand the issues that keep us from having Pictural
Route Shields. The issue is on github [1] but as best as I can understand,
it gets down to how we (US) tag routes. From talking to Paul Norman we need
to fix the tagging problems before we can get pictural route shields.
Kind of thought this was settled already, even in the strange cases of
states with multiple highway networks (Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, to name
three).
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
I've been trying to understand the issues that keep us from
i think this has kind of wandered off topic for tagging, as no new
tagging needs to be developed...
On 11/28/14 6:39 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Kind of thought this was settled already, even in the strange cases of
states with multiple highway networks (Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, to
name three).
On Nov 29, 2014, at 4:26 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:11 PM, johnw jo...@mac.com
mailto:jo...@mac.com wrote:
That looks really good. Some graphic designers need to remake the shields for
icon size (bigger lettering, details ignored), but the
If I recall correctly from a discussion on the Talk-us list a while back, the
preferred way in the US is now to specify the shield in a route relation. I did
not follow the discussion fully but my impression is that the tagging allowed
for custom specification of the shield. It looks like
On 11/27/14 10:39 AM, Tod Fitch wrote:
If I recall correctly from a discussion on the Talk-us list a while back, the
preferred way in the US is now to specify the shield in a route relation. I did
not follow the discussion fully but my impression is that the tagging allowed
for custom
I think having it on the relation is a great idea, especially since adding the
tags to all the road segments sounds like an insane amount of tagging . Is this
something that we should ask Phil to create a formal proposal page for the
tags, so we can start adding symbol key values to relations?
On 11/27/14 6:48 PM, johnw wrote:
I think having it on the relation is a great idea, especially since
adding the tags to all the road segments sounds like an insane amount
of tagging . Is this something that we should ask Phil to create a
formal proposal page for the tags, so we can start
Why not just compose this from the network tag on the relation? I'm almost
certain that was one of the motivating factors to going to route relations
in the first place.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 7:48 AM, johnw jo...@mac.com wrote:
I have a question about creating custom road shields, and I know
On Nov 28, 2014, at 9:53 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 11/27/14 6:48 PM, johnw wrote:
I think having it on the relation is a great idea, especially since adding
the tags to all the road segments sounds like an insane amount of tagging .
Is this something that we
14 matches
Mail list logo
