By the way, isn't this moment where we should talk how to do seperate
maps/layers for osm.org and how to deal with different kind of maps in
general? It is clear that road and traffic map won't have all shops
rendered (that would be serious overload of information), etc. Yes, we
have already
Hi,
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
By the way, isn't this moment where we should talk how to do seperate
maps/layers for osm.org and how to deal with different kind of maps in
general? It is clear that road and traffic map won't have all shops
rendered (that would be serious overload of
2009/12/14 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
By the way, isn't this moment where we should talk how to do seperate
maps/layers for osm.org and how to deal with different kind of maps in
general? It is clear that road and traffic map won't have all shops
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Where does proposed= is prohibited in the wiki?!?
I was confused. Some day I will find the page that made me think that.
It was a phrase like under no circumstances map proposed roads, but
maybe it was in some weird
Am 14.12.2009 10:05, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Yeah, and I think there is an unfortunate problem where the
wiki/mappers don't want to tell the renderers what to do, and the
renderers don't want to tell the mappers
Am 13.12.2009 11:35, schrieb Steve Bennett:
Sorry for the spam. Sort of. :)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Stevage/tagsupport
This is getting interesting. Side by side are now Mapnik, Osmarender,
Potlatch, JOSM, Kosmos, and the Map Features wiki page. It's rather
amusing, if a
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Maybe as a first step we'll iron out the unintended differences between
the renderers. That would already be a huge success! If this is done
Cool. Shall I leave that with you? :)
Hint: Don't try to get it all right
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
What is core and what is not ? What is in the wiki Map Features ?
A subset of those, probably. There is some really esoteric stuff in there.
But anyone can add his tag, approved by 10 or 12 voters in the Map
Features...
You
No. openstreetmap.org is not intended to become the better Google
Maps. openstreetmap.org is a showcase for what you can do with our
data. It cannot, and will not, host every map that someone could
possibly want made from our data.
Our data is there for the taking - you want OpenShopMap,
Hi,
Mike N. wrote:
No. openstreetmap.org is not intended to become the better Google
Maps. openstreetmap.org is a showcase for what you can do with our
data. It cannot, and will not, host every map that someone could
possibly want made from our data.
Our data is there for the taking - you
2009/12/14 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
Mike N. wrote:
No. openstreetmap.org is not intended to become the better Google
Maps. openstreetmap.org is a showcase for what you can do with our
data. It cannot, and will not, host every map that someone could
possibly want made from our
Hi,
Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
But what then is what we expect from default www.openstreetmap.org
map? What is shown and what's not?
The decision what to show and what not is made by the cartographer(s)
who design the map, based on what they feel is important and what they
feel works visually.
Am 14.12.2009 11:02, schrieb Pieren:
What is core and what is not ? What is in the wiki Map Features ?
But anyone can add his tag, approved by 10 or 12 voters in the Map
Features...
You cannot fix priorities for other people creating the data or other
applications using the data. What is the
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Sorry, I don't get it.
http://osm.org/go/0D60u1j3 shows some power=line in the mapnik layer.
Thanks for bringing this up, this was actually a bug in my code.
Mapnik doesn't use filters for certain tags (as discussed
The rendering rules doesn't matter a lot in this regard. It only
displays a cycleway with a certain color, thickness and such - so it can
be recognized as a cycleway. What the mapper wants to describe with
highway=cycleway and what a map user understands out of this is
basically out of the
Am 14.12.2009 11:59, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
Btw, I do think that OpenHikingMap should interpret highway=cycleway
exactly the same way as OpenCycleMap, OpenSwimMap,
OpenMarijuanaMap...etc. They will each render it differently,
Sorry for the spam. Sort of. :)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Stevage/tagsupport
This is getting interesting. Side by side are now Mapnik, Osmarender,
Potlatch, JOSM, Kosmos, and the Map Features wiki page. It's rather
amusing, if a little depressing, seeing how little correlation
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Actually, it would be
nice to have tag usage statistics from tagwatch or osmdoc in the table,
too
+1 !
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
The number of redlinks
(undocumented tags) is also somewhat alarming
The majority of redlinks are tags that are composed from a set of
possible keys and possible values that can be arbitrarily combined.
True, although
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Partly because of differences in the intention of the renderers. It
makes a difference if you want to have a nice map or if you want to aid
in editing.
Yeah, of course. The hypothetical SkiOSM renderer would
Am 14.12.2009 01:29, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Partly because of differences in the intention of the renderers. It
makes a difference if you want to have a nice map or if you want to aid
in editing.
Yeah, of
21 matches
Mail list logo
