building=livestock + livestock=* would be fine, especially if the
building doesn't look specifically designed for one type of animal
But for goats you might consider building=goat_barn or
building=goat_shed, depending on how large and solidly it is
constructed. In some climates goat's only need a
Dear Community,
thank you for your comments. I would like to try to summarise the
discussion so far:
- one group went of into a discussion on the different forms of stables
for pigs showing us the complexity of farm buildings and also the
complexity of wording
- commentators generally preferred
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 08:31:25 -0400
From: "Nita S."
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
Subject: Re: [Tagging] New proposal draft to simplify the mapping of
farm buildings (stables)
Around here those are called poll-barns. They are usually constructed with
Around here those are called poll-barns. They are usually constructed with
utility poles ( or similar ) a roof truss system, and corrugated/galvanized
metal sheets. They cover farm equipment, feed storage, and sometimes
animals.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 9:02 AM Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 28
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 23:35, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 01:02, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> more happy pigs to be found here (supposedly)
>>> https://www.naturalpigfarming.com/low%20res%2060/IMG_1385.jpg
>>>
>>
>> And that is a pig pen. But, according to some, also a pig
On 29/08/19 09:45, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Re: > "The best I could come up with was landuse=farmland +
produce=live_animal + animal=chicken"
It's more common to use landuse=farmyard for poultry farms, and if you
use produce=* it's more common to specify eggs, meat or live_animal=*
depending on
Re: > "The best I could come up with was landuse=farmland +
produce=live_animal + animal=chicken"
It's more common to use landuse=farmyard for poultry farms, and if you
use produce=* it's more common to specify eggs, meat or live_animal=*
depending on what is sold.
To specify that the farmyard
sent from a phone
> On 29. Aug 2019, at 00:34, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> The preferences range from free-range chickens
>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 01:02, Paul Allen wrote:
>
>
>> https://media.gettyimages.com/photos/pigs-are-seen-in-a-pigsty-at-a-farm-in-pluduno-western-france-on-2-picture-id465455096
>>
>
> As far as I can tell, that's classes as a piggery in British English. And
> since it's far more common
> than
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 15:37, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> With regard to pig sty referring to an outdoor enclosure: the dictionary
> says it can mean both, a small building or outside area where pigs are
> kept. This is similar to German where, AFAIK, the outdoor areas associated
> with an
sent from a phone
> On 28. Aug 2019, at 14:40, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> According to google translate, it's "pig flats," but I suspect it's being
> literal rather
> than giving the equivalent English term. I'd probably map it as
> building=piggery +
> levels=n.
maybe there isn’t an English
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 13:05, Peter Elderson wrote:
> Pig ark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb4wTc79jY8
>
I wish you hadn't said that. It forced me to do some googling.
Apparently, a pig sty isn't necessarily a building but is more usually an
enclosure.
Essentially it's a synonym for a
Pig ark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rb4wTc79jY8
Nederland has "varkensflats" ie multi-storey "appartment buildings" for
pigs. Wouldn't know a proper term for that in English though. I've seen it
translated as "pig tower", but that term googles to
https://images.app.goo.gl/WMeG3kychr7kokw7A
sent from a phone
> On 28. Aug 2019, at 13:26, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> If he were to propose some other value (I can't think of one) for a generic
> livestock-holding
> building then I would have less reason to object to the proposal. But I
> probably would still
> object - we have 24,000
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 08:29, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 27. Aug 2019, at 23:00, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Oh, and you say that a sty is for pigs (correct) and a sty is for cows
> (incorrect)
>
> probably just a copy +paste problem, and should have been cowshed
>
Yeah, that was my
sent from a phone
> On 27. Aug 2019, at 23:00, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Oh, and you say that a sty is for pigs (correct) and a sty is for cows
> (incorrect)
probably just a copy +paste problem, and should have been cowshed
>
> Introduce a new value for building that means "building for
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 21:39, mr.moehritz--- via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I would like to propose a new tagging-scheme for stables that would be
> more flexible.
>
More confused? Yes. Less precise? Yes. More flexible? A little, but
not so flexible
as just mapping all
I disagree with proposal to replace building=sty with
building=stable + animal=pig
building=sty tagging seems clearly preferable to me
And wildcard deprecations like
"Deprecate building=sty, building=sty and any therelike"
make me dislike this proposal even more.
27 Aug 2019, 22:37 by
Hi,
I would like to propose a new tagging-scheme for stables that would be
more flexible.
Please find my first draft here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Improving_Stables
I would be happy for any comments
Mo
___
Tagging
19 matches
Mail list logo
