Actually there is a problem here:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/water#values
"water" is already in wide use, but most of the values in use are not
part of the proposal. Maybe some amendmend or changing of the key name
(e.g. water:type seems to be what the proposal wants to achieve:
http://t
Ilya Zverev wrote:
> As some of you remember, there was a
> proposal for water=* tag. It was discussed, voted upon and approved by 16
> to 3 votes. But now there are some enraged wiki editors, one of whom erased
> the whole voting section and reverted status to "Proposed". And the
> reasons, which
On 11 May 2011 23:04, Richard Mann wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
>> The wiki should be a place to document the various parts of OSM, and for
>> things like software it can be useful. For tags, however, it is getting
>> steadily more and more complex and confusing and
Am 11.05.2011 15:04, schrieb Richard Mann:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
>> The wiki should be a place to document the various parts of OSM, and for
>> things like software it can be useful. For tags, however, it is getting
>> steadily more and more complex and confusing and
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> The wiki should be a place to document the various parts of OSM, and for
> things like software it can be useful. For tags, however, it is getting
> steadily more and more complex and confusing and less and less beneficial.
I think we need to s
On 11/05/11 12:38, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 11/05/2011 12:19, Ilya Zverev wrote:
I've reverted his edits of the proposal page, but is he right? Is any
proposal with incorrect subject line in tagging@ post (let along those
which weren't mentioned here) automatically invalid?
If so most of map fe
2011/5/11 Ilya Zverev :
> I've reverted his edits of the proposal page, but is he right? Is any
> proposal with incorrect subject line in tagging@ post (let along those
> which weren't mentioned here) automatically invalid?
Well, it is an established convention to send an email to tagging with
"V
On 11/05/2011 12:19, Ilya Zverev wrote:
I've reverted his edits of the proposal page, but is he right? Is any
proposal with incorrect subject line in tagging@ post (let along those
which weren't mentioned here) automatically invalid?
If so most of map features would be "invalid" because many
Hi.
Right now I've had a wtf moment. As some of you remember, there was a
proposal for water=* tag. It was discussed, voted upon and approved by 16
to 3 votes. But now there are some enraged wiki editors, one of whom erased
the whole voting section and reverted status to "Proposed". And the
reaso
