On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
wrote:
for a trail that anyone can use, but only after buying a permit.
I would use rather fee=yes and toll=yes rather than introducing yet
another tag value.
That would confuse the heck out of me. From that tagging I'd
On 2015-05-10 15:33, Volker Schmidt wrote :
We do have here roads where access with motor vehicles is limited to
residents plus residents of the town, where the road is.
Example: http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/H5QZAcvCLQBwhbF4u2mq7w (zoom
in to read the details)
How do I tag such situation?
2015-05-11 11:25 GMT+02:00 p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
s'. I know the literal translation is residents, but a delivery driver or
a friend visiting would be allowed to drive there.
I would use access = destination in these cases.
in Italy there are cases where destination doesn't hit it, because
On Mon May 11 10:03:48 2015 GMT+0100, André Pirard wrote:
On 2015-05-10 15:33, Volker Schmidt wrote :
We do have here roads where access with motor vehicles is limited to
residents plus residents of the town, where the road is.
Example: http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/H5QZAcvCLQBwhbF4u2mq7w
2015-05-11 0:22 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com:
I'd say the simple answer is access=private.
Anyone who has access knows they have access, and don't need OSM to tell
them.
private might be a good value for cases where you do need a written
permission, IMHO this residents
At some point you throw up your hands and ask what does it say on the sign?
access:motorcar=see_note
barrier=sign
sign:text=Requires campus NL permit with toll tag transponder.
Delivery excepted.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
My original question refers to the case of several roads where:
(a) motor_vehicles=destination applies for everyone
plus
(b) residents of a specific village have full motor_vehicle access
(indepenently of their destination)
On 11 May 2015 at 11:43, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
At
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com
wrote:
In the USA one occasionally sees local traffic only signed.
It's meant to counter cut-through traffic by commuters and delivery trucks.
Usually that would be access=destination. Not quite the same that you can
only
In the USA one occasionally sees local traffic only signed.
It's meant to counter cut-through traffic by commuters and delivery trucks.
One city installed physical barriers to such use:
http://www.ci.berkeley.ca.us/ContentDisplay.aspx?id=8238#Diverters
On Sun, 10 May 2015 15:22:38 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
I'd say the simple answer is access=private.
Anyone who has access knows they have access, and don't need OSM to
tell them.
That said I did just map access=permit_required + bicycle=no for a
trail that anyone
I'd say the simple answer is access=private.
Anyone who has access knows they have access, and don't need OSM to tell
them.
That said I did just map access=permit_required + bicycle=no for a trail
that anyone can use, but only after buying a permit.
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Volker
We do have here roads where access with motor vehicles is limited to
residents plus residents of the town, where the road is.
Example: http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/H5QZAcvCLQBwhbF4u2mq7w (zoom in to
read the details)
How do I tag such situation?
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
