2011/8/17 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
On 17/08/2011 12:19, Sander Deryckere wrote:
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least
how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
2011/8/23 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
My point is that all these tags
which are *now* established and widely in use, probably got that way without
discussion and documentation *in advance* but were simply taken into use by
the early contributors and documented afterwards.
+1, I also
Someone added last night a unique contribution in the wiki about a new tag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle_accident%3Dtrue
If we believe taginfo stats, this key has not been used until now. The
wiki page is also orphan.
Is it a good idea to keep such tag in the wiki ? Should we
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at least how
I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
Op 17 aug. 2011 11:39 schreef Pieren pier...@gmail.com het volgende:
Someone added last night
On 17/08/2011 12:19, Sander Deryckere wrote:
It has a bad discription, it's a tag for a temporary feature (at
least how I interpret it) and it didn't go via the voting process.
So I would just delete it and point the writer to the voting process.
Since when is the voting process
