2010/10/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> 2010/10/5 Jason Cunningham :
>> Planning Permission is often not acted upon,
>> and we should be mapping 'whats on the ground' or a status that affecting
>> the land (eg Nature Reserve). Planning Permission is doesn't impact the land
>> unless acted upon, in which
2010/10/5 Jason Cunningham :
> Planning Permission is often not acted upon,
> and we should be mapping 'whats on the ground' or a status that affecting
> the land (eg Nature Reserve). Planning Permission is doesn't impact the land
> unless acted upon, in which case the land should be tagged
> landu
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Jason Cunningham
> wrote:
>> I think Brownfield would be useful for mapping current status of previously
>> developed land, not currently used, and where the future use is unknown or
>> not agreed upon.
>
> Agr
On 6 October 2010 07:57, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Also agreed. Although there are cases of green grass with big signs
> all around selling off house and land packages. Clearly something will
> be built. Does it matter that construction hasn't technically started
> yet? (IMHO, given the difficulties
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Jason Cunningham
wrote:
> I think Brownfield would be useful for mapping current status of previously
> developed land, not currently used, and where the future use is unknown or
> not agreed upon.
Agreed. There are plenty of tracts of land you can see in aerial
ph
On 5 October 2010 12:15, Richard Mann <
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
> tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
> tagged "greenfield".
>
> A brownfield site is derelict land that was som
On 05/10/2010 12:15, Richard Mann wrote:
A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
tagged "greenfield".
A brownfield site is derelict land that was something once, but is now
nothing in particular until s
On 10/5/10 7:15 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
tagged "greenfield".
A brownfield site is derelict land that was something once, but is now
nothing in particular until so
A greenfield site is one that is currently a field, so it should be
tagged as a field until it gets built on. Nothing should ever be
tagged "greenfield".
A brownfield site is derelict land that was something once, but is now
nothing in particular until someone does something with it. A
"brownfield
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> According to the wiki, landuse=greenfield "Describes land scheduled
> for new development where there have been no buildings before". Does
> this mean that any undeveloped land owned by a developer or zoned as
> planned development is a gre
On 04/10/2010 23:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/10/4 Nathan Edgars II:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:11 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
I believe brownfield has the connotation of something substantial
having been there, like a military base or factory, that needs to be
cleaned up first.
so basicall
2010/10/4 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:11 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
>
> I believe brownfield has the connotation of something substantial
> having been there, like a military base or factory, that needs to be
> cleaned up first.
so basically "brownfield" is about contaminations and
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 5:11 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> actually I put brownfield because there is already a building (seems
> to fit to the wiki definition), but I'm not sufficiently familiar with
> anglo-saxon construction terminology to decide whether this is the
> right term in this conte
According to the wiki, landuse=greenfield "Describes land scheduled
for new development where there have been no buildings before". Does
this mean that any undeveloped land owned by a developer or zoned as
planned development is a greenfield? If so, should a bug be filed on
trac to render it less o
2010/10/4 Nathan Edgars II :
> According to the wiki, landuse=greenfield "Describes land scheduled
> for new development where there have been no buildings before". Does
> this mean that any undeveloped land owned by a developer or zoned as
> planned development is a greenfield?
I would say any l
15 matches
Mail list logo
