Bkill, at least in Italy hydrants are strong enough that it is impossible to
brake them using only its key and human force. Anyway, if you think this tag is
usefull, ok, map it.
I'm sure that also in Hungary OSM could help firefighters if hydrants mapping
will become capillar. We in Italy have
Yes, it was me who added that key to the wiki page, because it was
mentioned in one of our Hungarian documents some years ago and also I
wanted to use it.
I admit to my error in not noticing the latest proposals earlier. I've
just recently joined this list and I've specifically asked this here
in
Do note that fire hydrant plates depict opening direction, so if we
would need to store direction to close, a mapper would yet again need
to do mental work, that is not error prone and confusing.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 12:31 AM François Lacombe
wrote:
>
> The question about the opening direction
Hi,
Le mer. 10 oct. 2018 à 00:45, Paul Allen a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:31 PM François Lacombe <
> fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The question about the opening direction should be propagated to this
>> draft proposal regarding pipeline valves
>>
>>
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:31 PM François Lacombe
wrote:
> The question about the opening direction should be propagated to this
> draft proposal regarding pipeline valves
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pipeline_valves_proposal
>
> I thought about
The question about the opening direction should be propagated to this draft
proposal regarding pipeline valves
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Pipeline_valves_proposal
I thought about turn_to_close=clockwise / anticlockwise
Whatever the final answer will be, this definitely
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 9:34 PM Viking wrote:
>
> As we did for most of the tags in [0], I would not use fire_hydrant:
> prefix because we want a slim
database and because opening:direction=* is (or can be) used for other
> objects, as doors, taps, etc.
>
There are differing viewpoints on
Bkill, you added fire_hydrant:opening to wiki page [0], but you should have
discussed it here and/or in discussion page before.
We did many efforts to widely discuss fire hydrant extensions [1] and finally
approve them: you should at least discuss your proposal with people who spent
so much
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:14 PM Rich wrote:
> > Instead of
> > fire_hydrant:opening=cw
> > fire_hydrant:opening=ccw
> >
> > You need to type:
> > fire_hydrant:opening:direction=clockwise
> > fire_hydrant:opening:direction=anticlockwise
> >
> > Also, because the primary usage for `direction`
Wow, that's another indirection I need to keep in my head (translating
from the circular arrow), but it's a cool idea, none the less. :-)
I'll try to invite other editors who use such tags to better
understand their viewpoint.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:14 AM Rich wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 07,
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:55:03PM +0200, bkil wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 10:27 PM OSMDoudou
> <19b350d2-b1b3-4edb-ad96-288ea1238...@gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe leverage the existing direction tag (fire_hydrant:opening:direction) ?
> >
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction
That sounds like a reasonable idea - I see that it is widely used.
Although it is unfortunate how much bulk it adds.
Instead of
fire_hydrant:opening=cw
fire_hydrant:opening=ccw
You need to type:
fire_hydrant:opening:direction=clockwise
fire_hydrant:opening:direction=anticlockwise
Also, because
Maybe leverage the existing direction tag (fire_hydrant:opening:direction) ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hello,
Just a quick question, would you prefer `fire_hydrant:opening=*` or
`fire_hydrant:opening_direction=*`? The former is much easier to type,
but the latter is more self explanatory.
I see that it is present on signage in many countries.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 6:11 PM Viking wrote:
>
> >
> How would we verify check date, surely that is a record kept by the fire
> brigade?
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
Hi Phil,
well, operational_status:date can be inserted directly by firefighters.
I am a firfighter and we are interested in having this information online,
expecially when we are sent to
On Mon, 2018-10-01 at 23:29 +0200, Viking wrote:
> > Hi Alberto,
> > Nice to see you back there :)
> > Regarding check_date, I'd go in favor of operational_status:date.
> > working:* is too specific to fully functional hydrants, what about
> > disused or dry ones?
> > Then operational_status is a
>Hi Alberto,
>Nice to see you back there :)
>Regarding check_date, I'd go in favor of operational_status:date.
>working:* is too specific to fully functional hydrants, what about disused or
>dry ones?
>Then operational_status is a more complete solution to give state and
>associated date.
>All
Hi Alberto,
Nice to see you back there :)
Regarding check_date, I'd go in favor of operational_status:date.
working:* is too specific to fully functional hydrants, what about disused
or dry ones?
Then operational_status is a more complete solution to give state and
associated date.
All the
Hello, I would like to continue with fire hydrants' new tags [1].
Instead of the contested check_date=*, what do you think of
working:test_date=* [2] or working_test:date=* [3], both already in use?
Which syntax do you prefer?
[1]
19 matches
Mail list logo
