2016-09-18 21:12 GMT+02:00 Tobias Knerr :
> On 11.09.2016 12:46, Dave F wrote:
>
>> But it's *not a tunnel*
>>
>
> Before there was any dedicated tag for it, many people mapped it as
> tunnel=yes, so people definitely appear to intuitively consider it
> tunnel-like.
or
On 11.09.2016 12:46, Dave F wrote:
But it's *not a tunnel*
Before there was any dedicated tag for it, many people mapped it as
tunnel=yes, so people definitely appear to intuitively consider it
tunnel-like. (Perhaps that's also a language issue, not sure.)
That's why the new value was also
On 12/09/2016 01:15, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 11.09.2016 17:53, Dave F napisał(a):
Well, OK. 'Classification' then (which gives indications to who can
use it).
I still hold my position. Classification doesn't tell who can use it,
rather the purpose.
Hmm.. 'Motorway', when first mapped,
W dniu 11.09.2016 17:53, Dave F napisał(a):
Well, OK. 'Classification' then (which gives indications to who can use
it).
I still hold my position. Classification doesn't tell who can use it,
rather the purpose. Service road and corridor are clear about it: first
is for "last mile" servicing
On 11/09/2016 15:24, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 11.09.2016 15:48, Dave F napisał(a):
On 10/09/2016 12:43, Daniel Koć wrote:
BTW: There's also another interesting and quite established tag -
highway=corridor, which I've found lately:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
W dniu 11.09.2016 15:48, Dave F napisał(a):
On 10/09/2016 12:43, Daniel Koć wrote:
BTW: There's also another interesting and quite established tag -
highway=corridor, which I've found lately:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
Oh Great Scott.
It doesn't tell anyone
On 10/09/2016 12:43, Daniel Koć wrote:
BTW: There's also another interesting and quite established tag -
highway=corridor, which I've found lately:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
Oh Great Scott.
It doesn't tell anyone who can travel along it. It's useless. All
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:46:36AM +0100, Dave F wrote:
> But it's *not a tunnel*
that makes 2 votes for covered=building_passage and phasing out
tunnel=building_passage
Richard
>
> On 10/09/2016 12:23, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> >Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building*
But it's *not a tunnel*
On 10/09/2016 12:23, Simone Saviolo wrote:
Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and
colonnades have their own tag).
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 12:09:56PM +0100, Dave F wrote:
> Hmm...
> The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage
>
> Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)
>
W dniu 10.09.2016 13:23, Simone Saviolo napisał(a):
Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and
colonnades have their own tag). covered=yes just
Thank you for your feedback.
This is an important topic but I think that fixing a typo and approving
a tag are two different needs. Whether this tag is validated or not, I
think it should be fixed because the intent of those contributors was to
put building_passage and not those fancy
Yes, an obvious one: a building_passage *goes through a building* :)
Semantically it is quite important to distinguish between a
colonnade/arcade and a building passage (BTW, also arcades and colonnades
have their own tag). covered=yes just implies that the building is over the
highway, but it
Hmm...
The building_passage tag (65 445) is a new one to me.
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/tunnel=building_passage
Looking at the wiki it's very similar to covered=yes (254 624)
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/covered
I thought there was a discussion here where it was agreed to be
14 matches
Mail list logo