2016-09-18 21:12 GMT+02:00 Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de>:
> On 11.09.2016 12:46, Dave F wrote:
>> But it's *not a tunnel*
> Before there was any dedicated tag for it, many people mapped it as
> tunnel=yes, so people definitely appear to intuitively consider it
or maybe they just choose a tag that gets them the rendering they desire.
> That's why the new value was also put into the tunnel key.
> Technically, covered might have been better, but either one is a lot
> better than tunnel=yes. At least it can now be clearly distinguished from
> actually tunnels.
+1, and your choice of words ("actual tunnel") suggests you don't see them
as "real" tunnels either ;-)
Tagging mailing list