2012/9/10 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
permit=day/season
permit alone seems too ambiguous, I'd go for fishing:permit or permit:fishing
Then some info on where to obtain a permit.
-0.5, there might be cases where this is a useful information (could
be entered as free text in
Hi,
I'm currently trying to refresh a wiki translation of the Access key page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
But this page is raising some questions (for myself then imagine for newcomers):
- customer is documented as disputed in the Values table and
similar do destination. And
On 11.09.2012 14:17, Pieren wrote:
- customer is documented as disputed in the Values table and
similar do destination. And when you read the definition of
destination, it says e.g. customer parking lots. Very confusing.
I think too that a signle value is enough as already mentionned there.
Hi!
I'm looking for a map where I can see what ways are (not) tagged with
surface/smoothness. The tag width would be a nice-to-have. Maybe
something like OSMI?
Any hints for me?
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Subtagging doesn't really work with access - there may be different tags
using the destination value on the same object, and they might then need
different destination subtags.
Well. I'm waiting an example where the
http://www.itoworld.com/map/25
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
I'm looking for a map where I can see what ways are (not) tagged with
surface/smoothness. The tag width would be a nice-to-have. Maybe
something like OSMI?
Any hints for me?
2012/9/11 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com:
http://www.itoworld.com/map/25
Nice, but is also shows tracktype so the map is very colourful and its
hard to tell where surface is missing. Also it doesn't consider
smoothness if I'm not mistaken.
On 2012-09-10 18:46, Jason Cunningham wrote :
On 10 September 2012 14:05, Jonathan Bennett
openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk mailto:openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.uk
wrote:
On 10/09/2012 12:36, te...@free.fr mailto:te...@free.fr wrote:
I would like to store information about the legality
Am 11/set/2012 um 14:17 schrieb Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
I'm currently trying to refresh a wiki translation of the Access key page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
I think too that a signle value is enough as already mentionned there.
If we keep customer, we need another
Am 11/set/2012 um 14:55 schrieb Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
If you specify the access for customers, then you have to do it for
employees or visitors as well. Think about parkings or entrances
in theatres, hotels, airports, supermarkets, malls, factories,
hospitals, etc...
I don't agree
Pieren wrote:
If you specify the access for customers, then you have to do it for
employees or visitors as well. Think about parkings or entrances
in theatres, hotels, airports, supermarkets, malls, factories,
hospitals, etc...
Why? If I'm mapping a pub car park I want some way to say
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:58 PM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Why? If I'm mapping a pub car park I want some way to say access != the
great unwashed public. I'm not going to care that the bar staff actually
tend to park in a particular corner, or around the back.
Nobody
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Martin Koppenhöfer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
IIRR those were initially intended to mean the same.
but do you agree with the current definition ?
Strange tagging. Access=designated does not follow the convention mode of
transport=designated. You cannot
Hi,
for me visitors belongs to customer, and employee belongs to private.
I think between designated and official there are different opinions. For
now I would say there is no big difference. Both used primary for foot-,
cycle- or bridleways.
A way with a sign: Private way, use with own
Am 11.09.2012 um 16:10 schrieb Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de:
http://roads.osm4people.org/?zoom=7lat=49.60305lon=10.72137layers=B0TFF
Thanks! This covers surface, but smoothness isn't supported as far as I can see.
___
Tagging
From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:42:36 +0100
Send Tagging mailing list submissions to
tagging@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
From: tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Tagging Digest, Vol 36, Issue 17
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 14:42:36 +0100
Send Tagging mailing list submissions to
tagging@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
Although I don't know the history of the access tag, I would expect that
designated and permissive might have something to do with Public Rights
of Way in the UK:
* If a path is designated as a Public Footpath then you have a legal
right to walk on it and there is a legal structure protecting
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 21:03 +0100, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Although I don't know the history of the access tag, I would expect
that designated and permissive might have something to do with
Public Rights of Way in the UK:
I think they refer to England and Wales. Scotland has different access
Am 11.09.2012 18:14, schrieb Martin Vonwald (Imagic):
Am 11.09.2012 um 16:10 schrieb Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de:
http://roads.osm4people.org/?zoom=7lat=49.60305lon=10.72137layers=B0TFF
Thanks! This covers surface, but smoothness isn't supported as far as I can see.
not yet
20 matches
Mail list logo
