Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 14.07.2015 um 20:57 schrieb jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me: but planned routes are ones that have passed the usual planning discussions and are awaiting construction, which can sometimes be many months or years, but will happen, short of a

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread John Willis
Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2015, at 3:05 AM, Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com wrote: Some of the proposed highways* are clearly just flights of fancy with no timescale or money behind them. Yea, thats true - There are some freeways in California that have been proposed for 50 years!

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread moltonel
On 14 July 2015 19:57:30 GMT+01:00, jonat...@bigfatfrog67.me wrote: Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage! +1 Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes, because they may never come to

[Tagging] highway=crossing/crossing=traffic_signals

2015-07-14 Thread Dave F.
Hi The predefined options for a pedestrian road crossing that shares it's location with a set of traffic lights in P2, ID JOSM is highway=crossing crossing=traffic_signals: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1353800523 And yet it doesn't render in mapnik. Is this intentional or an

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread jonathan
Linguistically I would say proposed comes before planned. Planning your wedding is not the same as proposing marriage! Personally I don't think we should routinely display proposed routes, because they may never come to reality, but planned routes are ones that have passed the usual

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Andy Townsend
On 14/07/2015 18:23, Daniel Koć wrote: Hi, We're about to abandon rendering highway=proposed in the osm-carto (default OSM map style), but we think it's still good to show those which are closer to be really constructed: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654 Is

[Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Daniel Koć
Hi, We're about to abandon rendering highway=proposed in the osm-carto (default OSM map style), but we think it's still good to show those which are closer to be really constructed: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1654 Is highway=planned a good choice to be

Re: [Tagging] Highway proposed/planned distinction

2015-07-14 Thread Volker Schmidt
This is a question of language. The OSM life cycle discussion http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix lists planned as duplicate of proposed. I would agree with that. As a map user I always like maps that look ahead and show planned roadways, not only those where you can already see